camberiu
Registered
I would love for that to happen, but I very much doubt it. Would love for history to prove me wrong.I wonder if the last 4 years have scared and humbled the Dems enough to improve their act even a little bit.
I would love for that to happen, but I very much doubt it. Would love for history to prove me wrong.I wonder if the last 4 years have scared and humbled the Dems enough to improve their act even a little bit.
Gotta roll back Trump's policies. All of them. And Raytheon, Boeing and Lockheed Martin did not help fund the campaign because they were "woke" and cared about BLM and transgender rights. It was an investment and they expect return.Didn't even take 72 hours to start shuffling troops into Syria. Gullible slaves, the lot of you! It was about this the whole time.
I24news is an Israeli news agency. They're the ones who published the story. Sometimes you have to look at the story behind the story. Not everything you read as news is real news. Even though it may look like the real thing. If the US military had in fact just entered Syria it would be huge news. But it didn’t happened.Gotta roll back Trump's policies. All of them. And Raytheon, Boeing and Lockheed Martin did not help fund the campaign because they were "woke" and cared about BLM and transgender rights. It was an investment and they expect return.
US military convoy enters northeast Syria
I hope not. We shall see.But it didn’t happened.
To be honest, the National Review means nothing today, at all.Here is another traditional conservative voice, writing for one of the most "respected" conservative publications, on Trump-
I'd guess 15 days, or perhaps 30 at the most.Anyone wants to venture a guess of how long until this administration gets the US into another war?
Well said, Ben. It's nice to see that we sometimes agree.Further to our ongoing discussion of media credibility:
It isn’t just right wing publications.
The Washington Post Memory-Holed Kamala Harris' Bad Joke About Inmates Begging for Food and Water
There is good and bad news in this. The bad news is that one of the most mainstream publications around is clearly not above this kind of behavior.
The good news is that 1) removing an unflattering anecdote is still what qualifies as a media scandal in the mainstream media; 2) this Doesn’t Work. Competing outlets quickly bring this to light, not necessarily RW ones like Fox etc. Twitter amplifies these.
Hopefully this asinine move will trigger the Streisand effect.
Does it surprise you to discover this?The bad news is that one of the most mainstream publications around is clearly not above this kind of behavior.