Matiasba
Registered
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2012
- Messages
- 2,298
- Likes
- 1,069
At the time Menem took power, that was where the opportunities were, and he took them. The opportunities were a bit different when the Kirchners came to power, and they took those. Peronism has an enduring rhetoric of nacionalismo barato, but it has no principle other than opportunism.
so that is the only pattern you see between two governments, with Peronismo and Menemismo? that they saw an opportunity to get to power? soemhow I thought you were a little more intelligent.
What I do, if I want to compare governments, is analyse the policies, thier economic policies, what they did during the 10 years or whatever they lasted in government. How they did it, via which actors, who they beneffited, who they perjudiced, what they did, what that means, context, international context, and of course, more importantly, the results. Like full employment level is the other direction than 25% unemployment level, like nationalising is the opposite of privatising, etc.
The only pattern I find beetween Menem and Peron is their demagogia, which Menem stopped once he took power. The nacionalismo barato, as you call it, sadly, is the only nacionalismo, is the only national project of a country, the only project of industry, the only project in the long term, and if you study a little it was almost the same project of the other democratical party along the XXth century. Other projects like