camberiu
Registered
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2012
- Messages
- 3,880
- Likes
- 4,612
Again, you become agressive, as usual (I think you should look for help, you have a problem with UBA) because of the lack of arguments.
And "money back"?, UBA IS 100% FREE!!!!![]()
Not aggressive, just horrified at your comments. And I guess you consider the time you invested there as worthless, if you don't think they owe you a refund.
As I said, this could be considered centre left, ONLY TODAY, because the left, the original marxist left (that is: after the French Revolution but before Keynes) was way more radical and faught for the REVOLUTION. Today everything that dont follow the neoliberal principles is considered leftist. Keynes is considered leftist, while the LEFT always was something opposed to Capitalism. Again: Keynes is capitalism. What we have today with Lula and Cristina and EVo and Correa and Mujica is centre left, softer or lighter than the radical left (from Marx, 1870s, till the 1970s)
This is complete rubbish. What did you say you studied there, sociology? Political science? How can a someone who studied anything related to politics limit the left wing movement for the entire 19th and 20th century to Revolutionary Marxism? We had so many left wing egalitarian movements that were not Marxist and not revolutionary. We had Fabianism, co-operative socialism, the labour church, christian socialism and so much more, and that is just in England. We had the Democratic socialist movement in Germany during the 19th century and similar non-revolutionary egalitarian movements in all of Europe. Your definition of left being equal to revolutionary Marxism is absurd and would be laughed out loud at any school of political science (except for UBA, it seems).