I'd never heard of Diario Registrado.
Again, this is not a miss on translating the tone. What with photoshopping Macri onto the cover (from a 2012 issue, and hiding the date - that's the best part), it's damn close to a full-on forgery.
(UPDATE - Just in case you're not sure -
here's the article next to the photo of Macri. And to the left is an article about the Secret Service prostitute scandal in Cartagena, Colombia).
Hell, if the Panama Papers had smoking-gun evidence that Macri had stolen millions, it's questionable if it'd make it onto the cover of the NYT. Certainly not with a photo of that size.
Many Argentines, and probably a majority of the readership of Diario Registrado, does not grasp that. At all.
My question comes back to a direct one regarding bajo. I'm tempted to make this a poll:
- Does bajo_cero understand that Diario Registrado is deliberately misrepresenting the NYT regarding Macri? Ergo, by quoting it bajo is deliberately trolling us?
- Or does he, notwithstanding that he can easily read the NYT for himself, actually believe what Diario Registrado said? Can he be that big a moron??
- Is there a 3rd option? I see none.
I'm genuinely curious. I'd love to hear what people think.