Bajo_cero2
Registered
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2010
- Messages
- 7,950
- Likes
- 4,389
A poor argument is one which characterises the current political situation in Argentina with lazy terms such as fascist, absolute monarch or prinzip - or indeed, compares a democratically-elected government making decisions to the policies of Nazi Germany or apartheid-era South Africa. This does not help political argument and furthermore, demeans the suffering of those who died or were affected by such regimes. I wish people would stop doing this.
With all my respect, the legal debate is all about that.
I do not care about the political debate.
At Court the debate is between the legal system of the absolut power or a the republic where there are 3 independent powers of the State.
I mentioned several times that it makes no sense to use euphemisms like fascism or nazism that are usually used as insults because it is all about a renaissance of the medieval absolute state.
FYI it were german academics of law like Schmidt who created the terms fuhrerprinzip to describe a system where the will of the leader is beyond law.
Sampay, the lawyer who wrote most of the Constitution of 1949 copied Schmidt theory while Peron asserted that he was the State, just like Lois XIV.
The same happend with this DNU that ignored the Congress, the NC and that subjugates the Judges.
Today 2 per saltum before SC were granted to me. It is a by pass to all the other judges where you can go straight to SC, so, perhaps, the institutional situation is very serious.
The process on this DNU looks to be so fast that they deport you before judges can decide, not even in habeas corpus that it is the fastest process we have where judges decides in the 1st instance in hours, the second the day after, but it takes a lot more work to go to the next 2 chambers of appeals: casacion and SC. You have 10 working days to appeal (and you need them) and the judges takes no less than another 10 working days.
Until now, judges are ignoring this new decree.