Having mentioned
the previous cases that bajo_cero confidently asserted stuff that turned out to be
pulled out of his [.] rectal excavations, it ocurred to me that nearly every time bajo quoted something and I took the time to check it out, it turned out to be utter BS.
So I decided to do some reading. And lo and behold, look what I found!
The theory that bajo was/is pushing forward
was indeed the case, it appears, from 1984 until late 1991. Per Resolución 2650, adopted at the time that Law Nº 346 was reestablished as the foundation of Argentine nationality law (1984, post military dictatorship), Argentines entering on a foreign passport would have a permanent entry stamp stamped into said passport, with the word ARGENTINO written in. And yes, exiting the country was to be only on Argentine papers.
Here is the relevant text of that Resolución (emphasis added):
[sup][...]el argentino, naturalizado en otro país, debe seguir siendo considerado Argentino.[/sup]
[sup]Al momento del ingreso a la República y en el caso de presentar solamente pasaporte de la nacionalidad adquirida (en el caso de los países limítrofes, documento supletorio: C.I. o L.E. o L.C. o D.N.I.) se les podrá intervenir aquél o expedirle la tarjeta pertinente, según corresponda, estampándose el sello "Permanente" con la leyenda "Argentino" manuscrita bajo el sello.[/sup]
[sup]Para salir del país deberán hacerlo indefectiblemente con la documentación argentina pertinente.[/sup]
There were other procedures for citizens of countries that had concluded dual nationality agreements with Argentina, but for everyone else this was how it worked.
But that Resolución was amended in late 1991 with
Resolución 2578, which stated the following (emphasis added):
[sup]Modificar el Punto III del Anexo I de la Resolución D.N.M. Nº 2650 del 6 de diciembre de 1984, el que quedará redactado de la siguiente manera: "III - ARGENTINOS NATIVOS, NATURALIZADOS EN OTROS PAISES NO ENUMERADOS EN EL PUNTO II Y ARGENTINOS NATURALIZADOS, QUE HUBIERAN A SU VEZ OBTENIDO NUEVA NACIONALIDAD EN CUALQUIER PAIS DEL MUNDO, INCLUSO EN ALGUNO DE LOS MENCIONADOS EN EL PUNTO II:[/sup]
[sup]Tanto al momento del ingreso, cuanto al egreso o al intentar realizar trámites migratorios, serán considerados a todos los efectos como ARGENTINOS, ya que según la actual LEY DE NACIONALIDAD (346) la nacionalidad argentina no se pierde. Lo único que se pierde es el ejercicio de los derechos políticos.[/sup]
[sup]Al momento del ingreso a la República y en el caso de presentar solamente pasaporte de la nacionalidad adquirida (en el caso de los países limítrofes, documento supletorio: C.I. o L.E. o L.C. o D.N.I.) se les podrá intervenir aquél o expedirle la tarjeta pertinente, según corresponda, estampándose el sello 'PERMANENTE' con la leyenda 'ARGENTINO' manuscrita bajo el sello. Para salir del país deberán hacerlo con la documentación argentina pertinente, salvo que la permanencia en la República no hubiera excedido de SESENTA (60) días corridos, circunstancia ésta que les permitirá egresar con el documento de identidad de su nacionalidad adquirida, que hubieren utilizado para ingresar al país".[/sup]
You will note that the text of the bottom paragraph is functionally identical to the text in force today, which I quoted in the previous post. The main difference is that it granted only a 60-day grace period for Argentines to enter-exit the country on a foreign passport, rather than the 180 days established by Disposición 2742/2009 referenced below.
So the guidance bajo is peddling was obsolete since early 1992. I understand bajo_cero was out of the country, or simply busy with tango, or acuatic plant life or whatnot, during the past 25 years or so, so this may be news to him.
But the entire Resolución 2650, including the 1991 amendment, was deprecated/abolished in 2009, with the adoption of
Disposición 2742/2009. This is the one in force today. It expressly abolished the above resolutions in their entirety and established, among other things, that Argentines can depart the country on the same foreign passport on which they entered, as long as said entry was within the preceding 180 days. Q.E.D.
========
To quote something
I read recently by bajo_cero: I don´t understand how you are not ashamed of your ignorance and arrogance.
The difference, of course, is that in your case this ignorance concerns stuff you're supposed to know everything about:
this is your day job.
It boggles the mind.
Stuff which is literally your day job, and falls pretty squarely within your direct area of [in]competence, you, an attorney, turn out literally not to know shit about.
And it was all put together - chapter and verse - by a foreigner, whose native tongue isn't even Spanish, in the space of an hour.
For an attorney, of all things, (a "registered professional" to use your term), to blunder so badly his own area of expertise? Kinda unforgivable.
But the douchebaggery in responding to people who dare challenge you? Actually, fits in pretty well with that level of stupefying ignorance. Never mind.
