News In The Usa Is Argentina Might Default Again

[John.St]

Repsol, ... The payment for the oil they exported was to supply the internal market at a reduced profit and to invest in developing new sources of oil and gas.

No.

"The problem was a government approved practice of allowing Repsol to use profits to pay shareholder dividends rather than invest that money in the company's future. "That led to a lack of reinvestment in utilities, little exploration and dwindling reserves, as oil fields dried up and productivity fell," Fernandez said." [1]

This was part of the documentation I provided in post http://baexpats.org/..._50#entry240653

[1] http://www.huffingto..._n_1444144.html

Edit:
I suddenly remembered where I had the main source for the YPF Dividend Policy.

CASE A: THE EXPROPRIATION OF REPSOL-YPF (ARGENTINIAN VERSION)

Dividend Policy.

Following the agreement signed in late 2007 between Repsol-YPF and the Petersen Group, promoted by former President Néstor Kirchner, the parties agreed to a dividend policy that proved satisfactory to both. It also contributed to giving the company’s shares appeal in the
markets in terms of an appropriate relationship between dividends and earnings (payout). To this end, they agreed to distribute 90% of the company’s profits as dividends, in two installments each year.

http://www.balas.org/BALAS_2013_proceedings_data/data/documents/p637900.pdf p. 6

 

[John.St]

Defect almost duplicate deleted.

 

[Bajo_cero2]

The world has been waiting for 50 years to see whatever - which never showed up.

Focus, focus, wait and see what happend with YPF in the next 2/3 years.

 

[John.St]

Focus, focus, wait and see what happend with YPF in the next 2/3 years.

OK, I'll wait 23 years and see how close it comes to successful Aerolíneas.

 

[Bajo_cero2]

No.

"The problem was a government approved practice of allowing Repsol to use profits to pay shareholder dividends rather than invest that money in the company's future. "That led to a lack of reinvestment in utilities, little exploration and dwindling reserves, as oil fields dried up and productivity fell," Fernandez said." [1]

This was part of the documentation I provided in post http://baexpats.org/..._50#entry240653

[1] http://www.huffingto..._n_1444144.html

No? Are you a school teacher? Come on!

You don t need to quote your self, it was enough to read you once.

You quoted twice a newspaper, this is not documentation.

 

[Bajo_cero2]

OK, I'll wait 23 years and see how close it comes to successful Aerolíneas.

What happend? You didn t take the pill today?

 

[John.St]

No? Are you a school teacher? Come on!

You don t need to quote your self, it was enough to read you once.

You quoted twice a newspaper, this is not documentation.

No, the board software placed an incomplete copy at one position and the whole post here: http://baexpats.org/topic/28904-news-in-the-usa-is-argentina-might-default-again/page__st__70#entry240690

 

[John.St]

What happend? You didn t take the pill today?

Some years ago there was a poster who called himself Blah-Blah. Was that you?

 

[Bajo_cero2]

Some years ago there was a poster who called himself Blah-Blah. Was that you?

Troll, i got bored. Good night.

 

[John.St]

No? Are you a school teacher? Come on!

You don t need to quote your self, it was enough to read you once.

You quoted twice a newspaper, this is not documentation.

Oh, I see. If you write

Ok, i couldn t find the article that explained that, when a company has factories in Argentina and Brazil, they distributed the production in the way i described.

then it is first class documentation, and if I provide a link to an interview with Eduardo Fernandez, a former fuels director in Argentina's energy ministry, that is not valid documentation? Bajo, you are again trying viveza criolla, making up as you need it to "prove" your point.

Besides, you obviously don't know what trolling is. Look it up.