Nisman Dead!

I do not need intelligence to identify or understand the corruption of the cronys and politicians in Argentina. But when you work the system as you do Bajo I guess you don't have any options but to go along with the game. Throwing accusations at me or the US does not address the truth about Argentina. Once again the Argentine mind working its brilliant magic of passing the buck or pointing to or blaming something else instead of the addressing the real issues or circumstance.

Paying voters 50 pesos and box of food to vote for you is fraud there is no way around it. Therefore it is impossible to say someone won a democratic election legitimately.
It is not the argentinian way,is the way of some argentinians,im an argentinian,and i do not think the same as bajo_cero
 
Of course, because when bribe is legal (looby), then there is less corruption...??????

But this is off topic, let's focus on Nisman.

The problem is not lobbying ( I prefer to know rather than ignore who economically supports parties and candidates ) the real problem is where the money is coming from. In Argentina, the funds behind campaigns and candidates are unknown, whether it is a company a narco cartel, or laundered money.... that is the real problem.

Democracy is for adults, what Santa Claus is for children. Still it is the best system, buuuuut.......
 
The election process in Argentina is completely solid. The issue is how those ballot box decisions are made, however that is hardly unique to Argentina.

Buying votes (one assumes you mean via social plans etc) vs corporate influence in US politics? Which is the more damaged process? I would argue the duopoly of large corporations pulling the strings via their chosen political party, shaping policy and buying elections is worse in the US.

For the record the US is a republic not a democracy and that explains much of the differences between Argentina and the USA. Loosers vs Winners and much more. In an effort to stay on the Nisman topic I wont go into detail concerning this.
 
Back to Nisman: the gun was under the body, the bullet's shell was by the body... is this possible if the guy had shot himself?
 
Back to Nisman: the gun was under the body, the bullet's shell was by the body... is this possible if they guy had shot himself?

Honestly given the amount of corruption in Arg I would not believe anything unless I saw it myself.

However he could have fallen on the gun after the wound was inflicted so theoretically it is possible.
 
Back to Nisman: the gun was under the body, the bullet's shell was by the body... is this possible if they guy had shot himself?

Bathroom door and apartment door locked from the inside ?
 
Back
Top