Nisman Dead!

BTW,a fiscal of primera isntancia,makes more than 70.000 pesos a month

great info if true, and worth corroborating. Of the points by bajo that I strongly object to:
  • the personal smear against Nisman, primarily that he lived beyond his officially declared means;
  • the smear against his work, that his work was illegal or criminal in some way:
    • that his making use of the recordings (declassified, now that he's gone) was illegal/criminal;
    • that disclosing his work before congress is (or would have been) illegal/criminal;
    • that even if his allegations were true, because of supposed executive immunity, it was all pointless (and therefore, it follows, a waste of time and taxpayer money. I wonder if the same would apply to an investigation that bajo sympathizes with, say of Videla during the period when he was covered by a pardon). In other words, that the prosecutor has no business uncovering abuse of authority - even when that abuse is egregious enough to create a national scandal: a tough bar, at least here.
  • All of which - the allegations against him personally, and against his work - translates into the insinuation that Mr. Nisman was operating beyond his area of authority, competence and the law. It turns him from a hero into a shadowy figure and points to the vague conclusion that if not that he deserved his fate, at the least he had it coming to him to some extent.
I strongly disagree with this line of attack reasoning, it desecrates his memory - by most indications, the memory of a victim and hero. At this point it seems clear that he was fighting for the truth, and that the truth was scandalous enough to make hiding it worth committing murder.
 
Clearly a John Le Carre Thiller....!

Chapter One. In the Apt of a dead Prosecutor, a suicide suspect.

CIA , Mossad and Iranian forces in plot, sequences in Tehran, Tel-Aviv and CIA Washington .

Fictions are 10% of what reality is.
 
BTW,a fiscal of primera isntancia,makes more than 70.000 pesos a month

No. I made citizenship for the partner on one and i saw the working receipts. It was 13.000 pesos 2 years ago.
You have to add the years of service that add a plus. But, 70?
 
He wouldn't be interested in a murder or suicide that involved a .22. Maybe if the weapon was a Tomahawk.

Not the classical native american weapon/hatchet, but the AGM-109 Tomahawk cruise missile.
 
For what it's worth, a pistol loaded with a .22 short cartridge fired one time in a bathroom might be noticed, but probably not arouse too much interest. Through a wall, it could easily sound like something solid falling onto a tile floor. I do speak from experience.
 
For what it's worth, a pistol loaded with a .22 short cartridge fired one time in a bathroom might be noticed, but probably not arouse too much interest. Through a wall, it could easily sound like something solid falling onto a tile floor. I do speak from experience.

I think we've found the culprit right here!!!! :lol:
 
No. I made citizenship for the partner on one and i saw the working receipts. It was 13.000 pesos 2 years ago.
You have to add the years of service that add a plus. But, 70?
Today the head of the prosecutor union talked about that in lanata
 
Back
Top