I have always felt that Nestor Kirchner took a healthy distance from Hugo Chavezes radical policies and was pretty much like a poor imitation of Lula. After Nestors death the comparison between the two countries became more or less a grey zone. And in this new era, after the death of Hugo Chavez, there has been an increased discourse of closeness between Venezuela and Argentina. However, it's hard to predict if these ties are really based on anything more profound than just opportunism and the power play in international relations.
I think one of the problems of Kirchner is that apart from presenting herself as a charasmatic personality (which is absolutely laughable compared to that of Chávez) she doesn't really have an ideology. At least Chavez knew how to appeal to people with his socialist discourse, but apart from some of the subsidy programs and the increasingly isolationalist economic policies, this government in Argentina is as uncommited and unsteady as possible. It's not left-wing politics, neither right-wing, it's just a bombastic theatre without any true foundation. For K supporters, that is an inconvenient vision, but come on, even the name is absolutely ridiculous ''Frente para la Victoria''. At least names like ''Partido Socialista'' or ''Democracia Cristiana'' or even ''The National Socialists'' woul still make some sense, but this Cristina Kirchner circus can't even cover up that their only ideal is to steal from public funds.
This gov makes an authoritarian impression, and it increasingly is, but remember this is Argentina, a weird country where many developments simply turn out to be eternal illusions.