Bajo_cero2
Registered
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2010
- Messages
- 7,883
- Likes
- 4,307
I agree.
The relationship between both countries is very simple: Venezuela has oil and cash to buy argentine products like butter or toilet paper.
They also has money to lend argentina when nobody else wants to do it.
Critics on this subject are stupid.
Even Videla during "the dirty war against communism" had the Soviet Union as his best client (agrain and meat) and ally (they provided the location of the Royal Task Force to the AR Air Force).
http://elpais.com/di...002_850215.html
In the US I saw Chavez´s oil Station everywhere no matter how many US ambassadors ared kicked out of Venezuela.
Money talks.
Well, this is something good.
Seems (according with the examples you give) that the complain is that She has not an extremist ideology.
During the 70´s the Montoneros used to say they they were on the left of Peron while the AAA were on the righ wing, and with arrogancy they asserted that in the middle there was air.
Man, come on, you are saying the same.
The fact is that instead of air, in the middle is the people. That´s explains why She won by 54% of the votes.
The extreme left or right doesn´t represent the argentines. They are just extremist elites who represents it self.
Your complain is something like this:
D´Agostino Vargas; Calo Beron, Castillo Tanturi....what the hell...this ignorants are so primitive that they don t use names for the bands. It is wrong...what kind of name is this? This is not a name! (because you don t understand, right?) it is a wrong name because it doesn t clarify if the music they play is Jazz, Rock or Swing.
Helloooooooooo, in Argentina you have something unique called Tango and Argentines understand that first name is the singer and the seconds is the director of the Tango Orquesta. Right, it is called culture. We have developed our own culture.
The same happens with politics. Let´s see a super simplification:
Argentines takes very seriously the idea that we are not a Colony since English were repeal by common people in streets fighs during 1806 and 1807.
http://es.wikipedia....de_Buenos_Aires
Remember that later Argentina and Venezuela were the leaders of the independency war against Spain. That´s why you have Avenues or places called General San Martin in Argentina, Chile, Bolivia and Perú.
http://es.wikipedia....eral_San_Martin
On 1847 Juan Manuel de Rosas battled the navy of France and England in the Paraná River at Vuelta de Obligado because they asserted that the inner waters of Argentina were international waters. Foreing powers won the battle but the price was so high, that they gave up, so the war was won again by Argentine.
http://es.wikipedia....lta_de_Obligado
I go to the point now. During the 70´s, Montoneros before they were infiltrated by the ERP (Extreme left pro cuban), has a nationalist ideology that emulated the historical facts I quoted before. They were the young peronist who developed a new ideology that Peron lated rejected (even they said they were socialist, if you analisys the ideology, it is not. Peron rejected it because he was facist).
1. They were against the powerful monopolies that makes argentines poor in a Rich country. Prices are ridiculously.........Clarin sounds familiar? Techin; Alluar, REPSOL (they created the energy deficit we have of 12 billion dollars because they didn t invest a dime while they had to according to the contracts)
2. They were against the patria contratista (corrupt companies who work for the State charging 10 times more for whatever they do)
Macri for example, before the last dictadura had 7 companies. After it, they had over 40.
http://blogsdelagent...ria-contratist/
3. They were against the Sociedad Rural (farmer´s Union) because they are the oligarchy of this country. They behave like this is a monarchy and they are the nobility. It means, they don t have to pay taxes, if they don t like the government they coup it just like that..........Well, they failled this time.
The K taxed them strongly. remember the voto no positivo and the farmer´s lock out?
During the 70´s the phrase "Hasta la Victoria siempre" was identified with montoneros. Frente para la victoria means they have a Montoneros ideology.
Campora was the Peronist President who allowed Young Montoneros to get political power while Peron told them that they were too young, that they have to wait 30 years before to rule.
http://es.wikipedia....or_José_Cámpora
Campora means, then, to allow young politicians to make carrer by meritocracy instead of by age no matter how corrupt of negligent you are (autoritarism)
Frente para la Victoria is very clear about the "Montoneros" ideology of the partie until 1973 (it was infiltrated by the ERP, it means Marxism Leninism by brutal force) That´s why its political organization for young people is called "La Campora". It is super clear that it has nothing to do with the extreme Left or Marxism. It is the peronism of the young people of 1973 that after 40 years is old enought to make it happens by peaceful methods. During the 70´s they had some good ideas, a lot of optimism but they made a huge mistake of timming. They were debating with Peron (in personal chats face tp face) and he said that time saves blood while blood saves times. He advices to save blood, that they should wait another 30 years to rule. During the 70´s children of 18 years wanted to change injustice and they used violence to save time.
They were all killed, we all know. Their mothers who had nothing to do with politics, kept their political ideas alive as a way to keep them alive, but they add their wisdom: they choose time to save blood. It took 30 years to the mothers to acchive what their children attempt to do in 2 years.
The close relationship of the Government with the Mothers of Plaza de Mayo is very clear sign that they have nothing to do with violency of the 70´s. Instead, they addopted the wisdom of the pacifist philosophy of a groups of mothers who wait for 30 years to see the murderers of their children and grand children in Jail.
The policy that the police did not use violence with social manifestations is a clear example of what I mean. On the other political side we all know why Macri developed his own police task force and how he uses it.
So, Frente para la Victoria is super clear, La Campora too, as clear as Social Democracy or any other of the examples you used. It is only that you didn t understand it.
The one who ignores is like the one who is blind.
It is a weird country, I guess I tried to explain part of the why.
If the people of a country are "good slaves", there is less conflicts.
