cabrera said:
You have posted false and misleading information all through this forum and tried to treat an intelligent group of people as fools with your senseless propaganda and portrayal of palestinians and other middle eastern people who happen to not be jewish . Your rascism is far worse than any I have personally seen here and makes your case of being the victim pathetic and childish .
You are supporting genocide Darmanad fine but do it elsewhere as most Argentinians do not support genocide nor do they support misinformation and unintelligent debate .
Now I have to LOL. I have repeatedly asked you and your fellow ranters to specify where I have posted false info. Instead of replying with a cogent, substantive answer all you and they do is continue to spew infantile and uncouth terms like nigga, douche, BS , nazi and troll to demonize me - but no one has specified anything that I have posted as factually inaccurate. No amount of coaxing can get you or the others to specify any mistaken facts that I have posted so that we can have an honest debate. Your minds are made up. You don't want to know or be confused by the facts. You think your condemnation of Israel is hip and shows what a smart and ethical person you are. You epitomize the multicultural, politically correct know-nothing who feels so satisfyingly self-righteous by ceremoniously joining in the demonization of Israel without bothering to learn the issues.
By the way Islam is not a race. There are Muslims of all colors and genetic types. That you accuse me of racism just further demonstrates your ignorance.
SaraSara said:
It is not worth arguing with someone so obviously biased, that's why I poked fun at all that preaching.
Personally, I resent my hard-earned tax dollars going to support Israeli aggression. Things would be very different if Uncle Sam stopped bankrolling Israel to the tune of seven million dollars a day.
So after reconsideration you have decided to try to make a point, huh? I thought we had both agreed that based upon your silly childish remarks it would be pointless for you to join in the discussion in a serious meaningful way.
Okay, you're entitled to a change of heart. So now you say I am obviously biased. Against what?
I admit I am opposed to the core tenets of the Islamic belief system FOR THE REASONS I HAVE SPECIFIED. It is an intolerant, supremacist belief system that seeks to impose a worldwide caliphate under sharia law, a chauvinistic law that would give you one half the value of a man in a court of law as a witness. Law that would allow your husband to physically abuse you. That would punish apostasy and blasphemy with death. That would disallow freedom of conscience or expression. That would punish premarital sex and homosexual conduct with death. And that would not treat all persons equally under the law. Do you take issue with these statements? What do you know about the Quran, hadith and sharia? Have you read the Hamas Charter? What did you think of the Aznar piece? Did you read it? Do you think he, too, is biased based upon his statments:
The real threats to regional stability, however, are to be found in the rise of a radical Islamism which sees Israel’s destruction as the fulfilment of its religious destiny and, simultaneously in the case of Iran, as an expression of its ambitions for regional hegemony. Both phenomena are threats that affect not only Israel, but also the wider West and the world at large..........
The West is going through a period of confusion over the shape of the world’s future. To a great extent, this confusion is caused by a kind of masochistic self-doubt over our own identity; by the rule of political correctness; by a multiculturalism that forces us to our knees before others; and by a secularism which, irony of ironies, blinds us even when we are confronted by jihadis promoting the most fanatical incarnation of their faith. To abandon Israel to its fate, at this moment of all moments, would merely serve to illustrate how far we have sunk and how inexorable our decline now appears.
The only point of departure I might have with Aznar's statment is that he refers to the jihadis as promoting the most fanatical incarnation of their faith. In fact, it is simply the most pious. The Hamas, Hizbollah, Al Qaida and Taliban factions are comprised of Muslims who are acting exactly as prescribed in the Quran and sunnah/religious texts. Accordingly, they regard all land in the mideast as sacred waqf which can never be property on the kuffir.
Rather than poke fun at all my preaching, as you say, why don't you simply demonstrate with facts and reasoned argument how I am biased. I dare you.
p.s. I confess that I have bias against people who belittle others without putting forth any reasons to support their position.
