I made two crucial errors on my original post, and I would like to correct these. My errors were:
1. Confusing quality of life with happiness. I now realize these two things are totally separate. Quality of life should refer to such things as access to clean water, housing, medical care, education, jobs, etc. Happiness is a totally different concept. That is, you can have high quality of life and yet be very unhappy, and so on.
2. Quality of life should depend upon your stage in life. For example, if you are in your late twenties or early thirties and have no job, I would say that your quality of life is bad. However, at my age (65) who needs a job? If you need one, then maybe your quality of life is lower than others who don't need to work.
Needless to say, I do feel that in the USA we have gone a bit too far in the importance we attach to materialism. Here's a simple illustration but I think it proves the point. I was invited to play golf yesterday, in BA, at a private and rather expensive country club. I showed up in my nice golf uniform but I noticed other players were dressed down quite a bit and nobody seemed to care. Contrast this to my experience once at a private country club in Southern California. I knew the usual dress code: no jeans, etc. But it was summer, so I put on a pair of bermudas. They were a bit shorter than the typical bermuda, but certainly longer than tennis shorts. As I approached the number one tee, the starter came to see me and apologized about having to enforce their dress code. He then pulled out a measuring tape and actually measured the length of my shorts. I passed by three inches. Maybe dress codes and materialism are not the same thing, but . . . We definitely need to relax a bit more in the USA, in my opinion. In Argentina, of course, we should complain a lot more to try to improve customer service!!!
1. Confusing quality of life with happiness. I now realize these two things are totally separate. Quality of life should refer to such things as access to clean water, housing, medical care, education, jobs, etc. Happiness is a totally different concept. That is, you can have high quality of life and yet be very unhappy, and so on.
2. Quality of life should depend upon your stage in life. For example, if you are in your late twenties or early thirties and have no job, I would say that your quality of life is bad. However, at my age (65) who needs a job? If you need one, then maybe your quality of life is lower than others who don't need to work.
Needless to say, I do feel that in the USA we have gone a bit too far in the importance we attach to materialism. Here's a simple illustration but I think it proves the point. I was invited to play golf yesterday, in BA, at a private and rather expensive country club. I showed up in my nice golf uniform but I noticed other players were dressed down quite a bit and nobody seemed to care. Contrast this to my experience once at a private country club in Southern California. I knew the usual dress code: no jeans, etc. But it was summer, so I put on a pair of bermudas. They were a bit shorter than the typical bermuda, but certainly longer than tennis shorts. As I approached the number one tee, the starter came to see me and apologized about having to enforce their dress code. He then pulled out a measuring tape and actually measured the length of my shorts. I passed by three inches. Maybe dress codes and materialism are not the same thing, but . . . We definitely need to relax a bit more in the USA, in my opinion. In Argentina, of course, we should complain a lot more to try to improve customer service!!!