domthegreat said:
Furthermore, I am trying to figure out what is the best way to go with the whole thing...I am American, but my wife-to-be and I plan on living here for a few years after we get married...with the possibility of going back to the US in the future.
Based on what I read about US policy, if we were to get married in the US we would have to stay in the US after we get married there for her to apply for permanent residency...If we get married in Argentina, and then I apply for her to come as my foreign bride, she can get all of the paper work done while we are in Argentina, and then once she gets her visa we can go to the US and she will get her passport stamped saying she is a permanent resident.
But with all of the legal mumbo-jumbo you need here...would it just be easier if we got married in the US and then left to come back here, since it would be recognized here...?
I know a US citizen who married an Argentina here and then took his wife to the States to get residency there. They fly back and forth now, spending six months there every year (two months at a time) to maintain her residency until she gets permanent residency.
So, if you do something like that, you'll have to make sure you are going back to the States anyway to maintain her residency and spend 6 months there to ensure it.
If you're going to do that, I see no reason why you would need residency here during that process. You would be living here legally for six months at a time if you are a tourist, if you live there six months as well and you wouldn't need residency to stay here legally in that case.
As far as you having to stay in the US to get her visa after you're married there, I don't believe you have to do that, or lose the ability to do it later. As I understand it, you can marry in the US then move here and when you plan to move back to the US, go through the process at that time. It depends on whether or not you can continue to go back and forth between the US and Argentina and maintain her residency there (in either time or money) as to whether or not it makes sense.
If you are not going to get her residency in the US off the bat and fly back and forth, just put that off and get your residency here first. Things are much more simple that way.
I can't get a tourist visa for my wife to visit the US (freaking idiots). We've been married for 4 years. It doesn't matter that my father's got cancer, my mother had a stroke a few years ago, etc - they've never met their new daughter-in-law. I've considered going through the process of getting her a spouse visa but we haven't for the simple reason that it's relatively expensive and time consuming to do so, and on top of that I would have to do like my friend and spend 6 months out of the year there to maintain it - I can't afford the travel costs
I have bigger problems getting my wife a visa to the US because she's Paraguayan. She was told when they rejected her application that her biggest problem was that she was an immigrant here in Argentina and to give her a tourist visa to the US would be too tempting for her to immigrate there illegally. It made no sense to me whatsoever - why would she immigrate there illegally when she could do it legally through her marriage to me?
Also, she only has a bank account here. Until recently she didn't work and therefore has no record of tax payments, doesn't own a car, doesn't own property, etc.
They also told me that applications for tourist visas could not take anything into account other than the person who is applying for the visa - so the fact that she was married to an American whose parents were aging didn't carry any weight whatsoever.
I really despise the US' immigration policies, but that's another subject.
However, if you all are planning to get married there, I assume you've already gotten a visa (or are reasonably confident you can do so) for her. Being Argentina, with roots in her own country, etc, she probably wouldn't have much of a problem anyway.