Cool thread, I got tempted to add something!
Hasn't it just been proved that total liberalism simply doesn't work? isn't the whole world suffering a Horrible economical crisis which affects all the layers of society - ESPECIALLY IN POOR COUNTRIES?
I'm living in Holland right now, a very very very rich, supposedly liberal but actually quite socialist country, and the effects are hardly noticeable. Yes a bunch of banks went bankrupt, yes, real estate is frozen, but that's it. What did the huge liberal dutch companies like Phillips do? First started firing people in their locations outside of Holland, protecting their own. Here practically no one lost their jobs. The rich papa-state saved the day.
What happened to ultra liberal Iceland? What happened in Spain? What happened in the US?
I don't think Argentina could handle liberalism. We had our own liberalism-crisis in 2001, half of the people who weren't poor by then, got poor. We tried to believe that we could compete with the 'real markets', but that was all a fantasy we could not actually afford - because liberalism doesn't go well with poverty, or with lack of industry, or, or. etc.
We are poor country guys, it's every man for himself. We don't have a sense of 'the common good'. That's why there can't be progress. Everyone is trying to make sure they have food on the table tomorrow, not to invest on long lasting tools to actually grow as a country. You know what happens when Argentina tries to have a liberal market? everybody starts planting soja, and exhausting the only land we have for ever and ever, just so that they can get rich in 7 years. After that they don't need to plant anymore anyway. Or exporting all their beef, because they can get dollars for it, and the argentineans end up having to import Uruguayan meat for national consumption...
So, to wrap up, no, I don't think liberalism is what Argentina needs.
What does it need? That question would extend my already long post even longer, so I'll leave it for next time