GS_Dirtboy
Registered
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2012
- Messages
- 2,495
- Likes
- 4,316
Agreed, but why is that the the Federal's government job to address this issue, instead of the individual/local community? Where in the Constitution is it stated that it is the job or responsibility of the Federal government to solve this issue?
I think it is very "conservative" to be charitable, compassionate and to offer a helping hand whenever possible. My issue is when people want "compassion" to happen forcefully under the gun of the Federal government.
If this is a rhetorical question about libertarian government then my answer is I'd rather see less government than more. If it is a practical question then my answer is that the government is already in the healthcare business and we can't just turn back time (sorry, Cher) and unplug it.
Most people, given the possibility to "opt-in" and not pay will do just that. Further, most people are not naturally compassionate. If we had a voluntary program where everyone paid a certain amount yearly into a fund to provide healthcare for the needy do you think that program would work? I really doubt it. Especially if you could use the resources of the program whether you paid or didn't pay.