The Best Reason Now To Be An Expat In Argentina...

[steveinbsas]

When is the right time to get a fire insurance? when the house it already burning?

That is an excellent question!

The preexisting condition provision of Obamacare "gives" individuals the option to pay a small tax instead of enrolling in a plan. When they get sick, then they can enroll and perhaps receive care. The only thing they are guaranteed is that they can enroll after getting sick or being in an accident.

That's not the way "insurance" works.

As long as not enrolling entails a (much) smaller tax than the cost of an approved plan and it is not a crime not to enroll, many people will simply not participate in Obamacare until they "need" to.

And they will not receive the "preventative" care that was supposed to actually reduce illness and lower health care costs as part of the original plan.

In order for Obamacare to "work" more coercion will be necessary. And it is coming.

It may take a while, but the single payer "option" will eventually be the solution.

And it's what Obama wanted all along.

 

[ajoknoblauch]

When is the right time to get a fire insurance? when the house it already burning?

But don't altruistic, understanding insurance companies allow you to purchase a policy retroactively if you need a triple bypass at 40? Or younger?

 

[John.St]

How can this be real? it must be a lie (probably just an actor playing the President to make him look either like a liar or a dunce or an irresponsible patsy):

http://twitchy.com/2...ess-conference/

Outrageous!
Damn Obama, he showed himself as an honest man who apologised for errors and problems - "that's on us, on me".

https://www.youtube....?v=N6oFQfuFp4k

 

[steveinbsas]

Outrageous!
Damn Obama, he showed himself as an honest man who apologised for errors and problems - "that's on us, on me".

Anyone American who believes his apology is sincere or that he is an honest man is either very gullible or shares Obama's agenda for turning American into a country where the state is supreme and individuals are subject to greater and greater central control..aka the fundamental transformation of America..

Lucky you if you are not an American.

He doesn't want Obamacare to work as passed into law. He has already made it clear he want a single payer system and that, essentially, means Medicare for everyone. It will result in lower quality medical care...and less of it.

Obama know s this and that is his goal.

Some might call it social justice.

Others call it tyranny.

 

[ajoknoblauch]

Anyone American who believes his apology is sincere or that he is an honest man is either very gullible or shares Obama's agenda for turning American into a country where the state is supreme and individuals are subject to greater and greater central control..aka the fundamental transformation of America..

Lucky you if you are not an American.

He doesn't want Obamacare to work as passed into law. He has already made it clear he want a single payer system and that, essentially, means Medicare for everyone. It will result in lower quality medical care...and less of it.

Obama know s this and that is his goal.

Some might call it social justice.

Others call it tyranny.

Purposeful impoverishment of the public, otherwise known as Republicanism, is the true tyranny.

 

[John.St]

Anyone American who believes his apology is sincere or that he is an honest man is either very gullible or shares Obama's agenda for turning American into a country where the state is supreme and individuals are subject to greater and greater central control..aka the fundamental transformation of America..

Lucky you if you are not an American.

He doesn't want Obamacare to work as passed into law. He has already made it clear he want a single payer system and that, essentially, means Medicare for everyone. It will result in lower quality medical care...and less of it.

Obama know s this and that is his goal.

Some might call it social justice.

Others call it tyranny.

Absolutely!

- and it will kill more than 400 million Americans every year B)

 

[dennisr]

Damn Steve, lighten up. All this rhetoric reminds me of McCarthyism.

 

[steveinbsas]

excess regulation

Purposeful impoverishment of the public, otherwise known as Republicanism, is the true tyranny.

If you mean the Republican party it would make much more sense to to say so. I think of Republicanism as a form of government.

Please explain how "Republicanism" impoverishes the public.

f you mean the Republican Party, please explain what they have done in a tyrannical fashion to impoverish individuals. Could it be cutting welfare or social programs?

What form of government purposefully impoverishes individuals (aka the public)?

A "democratic" welfare state.

The percentage of "the public" who are dependent on the welfare state has increased dramatically during Obama's presidency. He has been able to act outside the legal limits of his authority without effective opposition from the Republicans. His orders are destroying not only jobs but entire industries. That is purposeful impoverishment of the public and his orders fit the true definition of tyranny.

 

[John.St]

The percentage of "the public" who are dependent on the welfare state has increased dramatically during Obama's presidency.

- and the financial crisis had nothing to do with it?

 

[steveinbsas]

Damn Steve, lighten up. All this rhetoric reminds me of McCarthyism.

Only the light hearted obama sychphants and socialists should make a point in this thread?

Please use quotes if you want to "compare" me to McCarthy.

I'm standing up for liberty and freedom against one man and his ideology.

That man is the President of the United States.

Was McCarthy concerned that the President of the United States was a communist or a Marxist?

I don't think so.

The current President of the United States is.

And the Republic is at stake.