gracielle
Registered
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2005
- Messages
- 3,659
- Likes
- 3,010
Glasgojohn - I agree with your statement. There are many complex issues, some cultural, at play on this subject. I will attempt to give my opinion on the 3 very valid points which you site.
1. http://www.lanacion.com.ar/1889684-en-medio-de-su-disputa-con-las-autoridades-uber-sera-gratis-por-cinco-dias-en-buenos-aires
"Los trámites para constituir la empresa de forma local como sociedad anónima comenzaron en diciembre pasado, con el objetivo de dar asistencia a las acciones de marketing. Después de esta gestión, Uber planea solicitar el CUIT. "Después de finalizar los trámites, esta sociedad argentina va a facturar oportunamente todos los servicios que está prestando ahora sin dejar de pagar ningún impuesto que aplique en el país", dijo la compañía." I don't doubt that Uber will obtain a CUIT and pay applicable taxes. But in the meantime the company is getting a ton of free publicity.
The Uber drivers, as well, will be required to pay taxes as independent contractors. In SF Uber transfers the portion due to the driver to his bank account and produce a 1099 annually. Driver is responsible for obtaining a Tax ID #, make IRS quarterly contributions and annual tax filing. I assume that Uber will not pay drivers here "en negro".
Drivers will provide an AFIP ID# as independent contractors, etc, etc. to comply with ARG law. It's the job of Rentas Ciudad (AGIP) to audit drivers (taxi, Uber, etc) to ensure they are following local fiscal laws. Although said payment could be transferred via PayPal (or other similar service) which AGIP may not currently have capability to trace.
2 & 3. Require all Uber drivers to obtain a professional license as well. This will make it possible for them to insure their vehicles to carry x-number of passengers for commercial purposes. How about the CABA taxi union, which represents non-owner drivers, reduce their fees to assist those drivers to compete? In ARG nobody is willing to negotiate an inch of what they consider to be their "territory".
I would prefer the city to follow the guidelines for Uber that Mexico D.F. finally adopt ed in July 2015.
http://www.lanacion.com.ar/1810941-mexico-anuncio-la-primera-regulacion-de-america-latina-para-el-servicio-de-choferes-uber
The increase of ABL taxes will continue to happen no matter what! The 2016 fiscal valuation of my PH (from said amount the 1% ABL is calculated) has increased since 2007. But not accelerated in tandem with the annual inflation rate. Regardless, said figure, then and now, is MUCH lower than the "market value" in pesos of my duplex at it's lowest annual denominator per Reporte Inmobiliario for Caballito.
But the ABL cannot be increased arbitrarily......Ley Tarifa 1.040
http://chequeado.com/ultimas-noticias/aumento-del-abl-y-del-inmobiliario-urbano-justificaciones-y-comparaciones-de-macri/
I am sure Uber did market research and concluded that CABA is now very ripe for this type of business. They have investors with deep pockets. They seem prepared to lose millions to compete with their formidable rival . Didi Kuaidi. It's the People’s Republic’s answer to Uber, a combined entity of Chinese ride-hailing services Didi Dachand and Kuaidi Dache. I wonder if the rickshaw drivers complained? Probably not. And I don't necessarily attribute this to pressure from their dictatorial regime. More likely it's because there is a market for everybody.
1. http://www.lanacion.com.ar/1889684-en-medio-de-su-disputa-con-las-autoridades-uber-sera-gratis-por-cinco-dias-en-buenos-aires
"Los trámites para constituir la empresa de forma local como sociedad anónima comenzaron en diciembre pasado, con el objetivo de dar asistencia a las acciones de marketing. Después de esta gestión, Uber planea solicitar el CUIT. "Después de finalizar los trámites, esta sociedad argentina va a facturar oportunamente todos los servicios que está prestando ahora sin dejar de pagar ningún impuesto que aplique en el país", dijo la compañía." I don't doubt that Uber will obtain a CUIT and pay applicable taxes. But in the meantime the company is getting a ton of free publicity.
The Uber drivers, as well, will be required to pay taxes as independent contractors. In SF Uber transfers the portion due to the driver to his bank account and produce a 1099 annually. Driver is responsible for obtaining a Tax ID #, make IRS quarterly contributions and annual tax filing. I assume that Uber will not pay drivers here "en negro".
Drivers will provide an AFIP ID# as independent contractors, etc, etc. to comply with ARG law. It's the job of Rentas Ciudad (AGIP) to audit drivers (taxi, Uber, etc) to ensure they are following local fiscal laws. Although said payment could be transferred via PayPal (or other similar service) which AGIP may not currently have capability to trace.
2 & 3. Require all Uber drivers to obtain a professional license as well. This will make it possible for them to insure their vehicles to carry x-number of passengers for commercial purposes. How about the CABA taxi union, which represents non-owner drivers, reduce their fees to assist those drivers to compete? In ARG nobody is willing to negotiate an inch of what they consider to be their "territory".
I would prefer the city to follow the guidelines for Uber that Mexico D.F. finally adopt ed in July 2015.
http://www.lanacion.com.ar/1810941-mexico-anuncio-la-primera-regulacion-de-america-latina-para-el-servicio-de-choferes-uber
The increase of ABL taxes will continue to happen no matter what! The 2016 fiscal valuation of my PH (from said amount the 1% ABL is calculated) has increased since 2007. But not accelerated in tandem with the annual inflation rate. Regardless, said figure, then and now, is MUCH lower than the "market value" in pesos of my duplex at it's lowest annual denominator per Reporte Inmobiliario for Caballito.
But the ABL cannot be increased arbitrarily......Ley Tarifa 1.040
http://chequeado.com/ultimas-noticias/aumento-del-abl-y-del-inmobiliario-urbano-justificaciones-y-comparaciones-de-macri/
- “Todos tenemos que ir convergiendo a pagar del orden del 1% del valor de nuestra propiedad, que es lo que se paga en todas parte del mundo como mínimo”. VERDADERO
I am sure Uber did market research and concluded that CABA is now very ripe for this type of business. They have investors with deep pockets. They seem prepared to lose millions to compete with their formidable rival . Didi Kuaidi. It's the People’s Republic’s answer to Uber, a combined entity of Chinese ride-hailing services Didi Dachand and Kuaidi Dache. I wonder if the rickshaw drivers complained? Probably not. And I don't necessarily attribute this to pressure from their dictatorial regime. More likely it's because there is a market for everybody.