dr__dawggy
Registered
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2010
- Messages
- 327
- Likes
- 167
--Since Al Qaeda has now confirmed that Osama has been killed it seems unnecessary to provide either DNA or photographic evidence.perry said:Any free thinking person with any semblance of intelligence would question this story about Bin Laden.
If he was killed where is the DNA evidence
Why was he buried at sea when clearly this is not Muslim tradition .
Why did they not capture him alive as he could help clearly in information useful for the so called war of terror
These are just a few questions I have in regards to this case.
--Islamic law does provide for burials at sea although it is not the norm. The stated rationale, namely that a land burial would provide a specifc location for the faithful Islamofascists to rally around sounds entirely plausible.
---Going into a darkened compound at 2AM, being greeted by automatic weapon fire, encountering barricades at every turn, knowing of the propensity of Islamic radicals to blow themselves and others up, Osama's stated intent to go down fighting, all led to a presumption that barring a clear surrender anyone the Seal Team encountered should be considered a threat. Not hard to understand.
I do not blindly accept everything the US government says....I protested the war in Viet Namm; resisted the draft; and opposed the invasion of Iraq based on dubious claims of weapons of mass destruction. But in the case of Osama Bin Laden and his guilt or innocence, the fact that virtually no source on the side of the US or its enemies have come forward to say our claims about his involvement are false provides a solid basis for concluding that he was the terrorist the US and the UK made him out to be. I did not dance in the streets when he was killed, but I was relieved that Osama will not be responsible for additional deaths. http://baexpats.org/editpost.php?do=editpost&p=113738