Welcome To The Dictatorship Of Happiness

[EdRooney]

Logic dies weeping.

"I dislike X person therefore I believe Y bad thing about her even though there is no evidence"

 

[Rich One]

Logic dies weeping.

"I dislike X person therefore I believe Y bad thing about her even though there is no evidence"

There is No evidence on either posture , he choses One I chose the Other Logic WHAT Logic Bonafini's.... :wub:

 

[EdRooney]

I never saw Ejcot insist they were dead. He only asked for you to provide evidence for your assertion that they were alive. Big difference. Burden of proof is on you, not on him. You should either post reliable evidence or withdraw your assertion.

Also your "plague on both our houses" argument does not exempt you from the fact that your last post pounded logic into a bloody pulp.

 

[Rich One]

Bonafini herself Stated,,, to Perfil..".My children are alive..." Perfil Also Miente- ??

. I presented several sources... Ejecot contended that the sources had no credibility since they publish Lesbian Tests.... jajjaajja .

Forget the Burden of the Proof... jajajjaajaj

 

[scotttswan]

Your position is very clear the Children are alive.... ! I read the sources implying she is hiding the truth . Since I dislike her so much I like to believe the latter..... Here is why i DISLIKE HER...

The most memorable phrase of Bonafini is linked to the attack on the Twin Towers in New York. In 2001, days after the attack that the world mourned, Bonafini said that when he learned of what happened felt "joy".

"I was with my daughter in Cuba and I was glad when I heard the news. I will not be hypocritical it with this topic: it did not hurt at all the attack, "he said.

The head of Mothers of the Plaza de Mayo also had unfortunate quotations against the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation, journalists and even against former President Raul Alfonsin, on the very day of his death.

Bonafini, in sentences

Alfonsin's wake: "It was a mobilization of the upper and middle classes, who always come to these things. From my place, I make the biggest repudiation for all the hypocrites who were clapping. "

Julio Cobos: ". Is building a parallel government and that is being a son of a thousand bitches, Someone has to get him out of the house right now Rosada.No no other, we have to finish this."

The opening of the Museum of Memory. "What a pity they are no FAL rifles, the weapons with which our children wanted to make the revolution If the museum is not going to show how it was that revolutionary organization, the struggles that ensued, facts they were made, no good. "

Susana Gimenez and the death penalty: "What is our assurance that these vedettes vedettes are whores, who dare to speak of human rights when they danced and slept with all the oppressors?"

The opposition majority in Congress: "Parliament is worthless, every day doing against us."

On the Colombian narco-guerrilla "We are with fellow FARC, we are with Chavez we are with our president Nestor K. Uribe is shit and son of a bitch.".

The journalist Horacio Verbitsky and the Jewish community: "It is a servant of the United States. Besides being Jewish, it is entirely pro-American ".

Farmers Protest against the Retenciones: "Another government would have chased them out with clubs and gases, as they deserved."

A message to the Supreme Court: "They are crooks accomplices of the dictatorship. They have to resign and have to go if they don't want to help people. You have to remove this Court's decision, decision is ours, Let's tear it off their hands and if we have to take over the Justice Ministry, let's take it over ".

English royalty, "If we chased them out once with boiling oil,lets begin to heat the oil. That old (Queen) lives in her castle; Well, she can stick it up her arse . I do not give a dam for the Queen's Castle ".

The Bolivian community: "Get out of our Plaza, Bolivians/Bolitas son of bitches, fucking Bolivians Go away!".

Yes there is no disputing she's a person with horrible views, but there's no proof her sons weren't murdered by the dictatorship. Where is the proof? Why has no journalist published an article about it?

What are the [background=rgb(252, 252, 252)]sources implying she is hiding the truth?

All i can find is the same article quoted over and over again saying an old famous journalist who is now dead interviewed her husband,[/background] who died in 1982, in 2002 in a "memorable" interview. It would certainly be memorable if he dug up the corpse and asked it questions to which it responded!

 

[scotttswan]

Bonafini herself Stated,,, to Perfil..".My children are alive..." Perfil Also Miente- ??

. I presented several sources... Ejecot contended that the sources had no credibility since they publish Lesbian Tests.... jajjaajja .

Forget the Burden of the Proof... jajajjaajaj

 

[scotttswan]

I never saw Ejcot insist they were dead. He only asked for you to provide evidence for your assertion that they were alive. Big difference. Burden of proof is on you, not on him. You should either post reliable evidence or withdraw your assertion.

Also your "plague on both our houses" argument does not exempt you from the fact that your last post pounded logic into a bloody pulp.

I'd love it if they were alive, it would be great for her to be removed from her position for lying all these years, the vile crap she spouts does a lot of harm to the people who lost family members during those years.

 

[scotttswan]

Bonafini herself Stated,,, to Perfil..".My children are alive..." Perfil Also Miente- ??

. I presented several sources... Ejecot contended that the sources had no credibility since they publish Lesbian Tests.... jajjaajja .

Forget the Burden of the Proof... jajajjaajaj

No that's part of what her movement does, they refuse to recognise the remains of their kids, that's why there's another group out there
https://es.wikipedia...Línea_Fundadora

Your other source is a bullshit site that talks about an interview with someone who has been dead since 1982?

 

[wineguy999]

If I offended you.. urr ummm is it possible your leap/best guess at understanding me caused you to be offended enough to just hurl away. Which means you lead yourself to such a response and post. My guess is you scanned my post and then just started a guessing game between your ears and then blurted your post out. I think it is best for tourist to refrain from assumptions that lead them to being offended. Just my 2 cents.

Let us evaluate your best guesses shall we?

1. I am not Argentina I left when they cut off the USD because I could see the writing on wall. But looking at moving back with my wife in about 6 months as she wants to go home.

2. Ad hominems - interesting terminology. The Doc is a Quack bottom line and I do not respect anything that supports or endorses what K and clan have brought about in Argentina in the last several years. And in reality the Quak Doc starting hurling the hate my way some time ago. Just for the record.

3. Rabid Republican - Well that could be taken as an insulted and clearly demonstrates your guessing game or assumptions could not be further from the truth. While I do hold some ideals embraced by republican thinking I surely to not agree with the vast majority of the thinking that is going on in the republican world at this time. I would have to be very dumb to do so. I could say the same for the democrats as well. Just the fact that current pole leader has gained so much popularity spewing out the level of fear, hate etc has amazed me and causes me to have great concern for my home land.

I could write more but we can just let this rest here. Thanks for sharing your insights even if they were completely off the mark. Enjoy Argentina!

Sorry, but I have to correct you. A "Quack" is a disreputable physician. Since we're talking about a lawyer, "Shyster" is a more appropriate usage - though I personally prefer "Mouthpiece".

 

[semigoodlookin]

Seems to be a lot of talk about Bajo's skills as a lawyer, do we have evidence that he is disreputable or bad at his job? I think it is unfounded and we should stick to calling him out for being an awful poster and not lower ourselves to personal attacks on his profession. Unless of course there is evidence to the contrary showing him to be a "shyster".