According to the law, people under criminal prosecution cannot get in.
Like I said, you lie or clearly the university that gave you a degree didn't bother to check if you could read -and understand- the law.
Proof 1: http://www.upl.co/uploads/20130508173413.png
Proof 2:
http://www.upl.co/up...30508173743.png
Proof 3:
http://www.upl.co/up...30508173748.png
You may make profits selling drugs, bring all that money here and no one would care to check the source of that money.
Get informed. There were many bonds before, they were paid. The whole thing about the dollar corralito is about keep paying the bonds.
Yes, please, get informed. A Cedin is not a bond. It doesn't have anything to do with a bond so making a comparison with a bond just shows that you clearly don't understand what you are talking about.
Again. Get informed. I give you a track: "Patacones"
Yes, again, get informed. A patacon is a different thing. A stock is another thing. A mutual fund is another thing. A plazo fijo is another thing. Are you going to keep throwing things until something sticks? You could at least try to read and understand economic instruments and their differences.
What a reliable source of info.
Like I said, there is something wrong with you. You said, and I quote "
To give it back, somebody has to ask for it. And guess what, nobody does it. I wonder why?". I showed you proof of how
someone asked for it without receiving a response from the AFIP and now you are using another new argument. In other words, when you said A and I show you how A is incorrect, you now say B, which is also incorrect cause there isn't another source of information. I gave you a declaracion jurada of a taxpayer, but it seems that you, as a person of law, found that not to be reliable source of information. You may now use excuse C to run away from the original argument.
Right or wrong, it is my point of view.
You don't have points of view, you are doing political propaganda.
