Like I said, you lie or clearly the university that gave you a degree didn't bother to check if you could read -and understand- the law.
Well, don t you thing that it is too arrogant what you are saying?
Let´s see. I m a local lawyer who asserted 2 years ago in this forum that I was going to change the precedents of the last 30 years having all the federal judges against me… and I did.
You may make profits selling drugs, bring all that money here and no one would care to check the source of that money.
You are obsessed with this. Ok, i follow you. Do Uruguay, Switzerland or the Caiman Island ask where the money come from? No.
So, why should the money be there when we need it here?
Yes, please, get informed. A Cedin is not a bond. It doesn't have anything to do with a bond so making a comparison with a bond just shows that you clearly don't understand what you are talking about.
You are confusing the "nomen iuris" with the “legal nature”.
The nomen iuris is just the name: bond, cedin, all the examples you gave.
When we talk about the legal nature we are doing research to find out what it is, studing how does it works.
The Cedin works like a pseudo currency, that s why i compared them some days ago with Patacones. If you read the newspapers today, they are doing the same comments days later.
Patacones as Cedins have an expiration date when they are going to be paid in a real currency. That s why i compared them with bonds.
So, Cedins are a bond plus a pseudo currency that looks for changing the place where the dollars are: from under the mattress to the Central Bank.
The State needs for dollars and they give you this bond they print. The advantage is the amnesty where you saved the taxes you didn t paid plus you cannot be prosecuted for not paying those taxes.
If you are in the drug business, you assets can be always confiscated no matter the nomen iuris.
Yes, again, get informed. A patacon is a different thing. A stock is another thing. A mutual fund is another thing. A plazo fijo is another thing. Are you going to keep throwing things until something sticks? You could at least try to read and understand economic instruments and their differences.
If you want to put the Cedins into a category you know, then you are going to make a mistake because as I explained briefly, they are an hybrid instrument.
Like I said, there is something wrong with you. You said, and I quote "To give it back, somebody has to ask for it. And guess what, nobody does it. I wonder why?". I showed you proof of how someone asked for it without receiving a response from the AFIP and now you are using another new argument. In other words, when you said A and I show you how A is incorrect, you now say B, which is also incorrect cause there isn't another source of information. I gave you a declaracion jurada of a taxpayer, but it seems that you, as a person of law, found that not to be reliable source of information. You may now use excuse C to run away from the original argument.
I just read a clear explanation of Nikad in another thread about how to get it back. Now are you going to say that she makes propaganda for the Campora? Please...
You don't have points of view, you are doing political propaganda.
Really? Nobody here have political rights. What are you talking about?
Look, to disagree is healthy but not always easy. Make an effort to respect people who think different than you.
