Mizzmar, thank you for the advice.
Bajo, thank you for the information. As far as the condescending attitude directed towards the asker of a relatively innocent (and clearly stated HYPOTHETICAL) question, please don't talk down to me.
I'm assuming you meant to say that my super idea was "trafficing with the intent of distribution", as you can not produce an already made consumable. I named a dileberately small amount as to acknowledge the fact that larger amounts may be identified as trafficing, hoping to illicit information on what amount might avoid that charge.
Also you will notice that the word "decriminalized" was in quotations and with some introspection you can deduce that the presence of the aforementioned puncuation (and the fact that this post exists at all) would most likely infer that I realize that marijuna has not officially been decriminalized. However, I was wondering if this landmark case would prevent prosecution in the event of interception. This does not make my question or "idea" stupid.
You see, not only am I a pot head, but I am a pot head who asks questions before acting, thoroughly checks the information given in response to those questions, and also doesnt talk down to people based on stereotypes.
If i misinterpreted the conotation of your post, forgive me for being brash.