Statistics:
After 12 months the statistics are the following:
- 97% of the reports granted even with new cases.
- 2 cases waiting for reports (there are legal debates because they are very complex cases).
- 44 revocatorias (revocatoria is an appeal before the same judge. It is unusual to win them but the advantaje is that you have a reply in 7 days).
- 42 revocatorias won.
- 13 appeals.
- 10 appeals won.
- 2 lost. 1 waiting for a desicion.
- 2 cases before Supreme Court (if SC doesn t open the cases, they aren t lost, it just mean that I use another way asking for sanctions for the judge straight at SC because he didn t grand the reports in 3 days).
- 7 deportation orders stopped because of the citizenship case.
- Delay to grand the reports with irregular immigration status: average nowadays is 1 month (it took between 3 up to 12 months with the first 10 cases).
- Average case timming: Between 7 up to 12 months.
- 4 cases ready for sentence (they are delayed because I am waiting for the FBI records that the clients have to give me)
- 7 cases are almost done with small issues (the police didn t go to check the address, the client is abroad and he didn t do the Spanish test, etc).
- 1 case is under study for sentence.
- 0 cases lost.
Clarification:
1) There were a lot of revocatorias and appeals until September 2011. After the 7th appeal was won, one of the prosecutors who was reluctant and many judges changed their mind because they understood that they risked being removed. It means that they continue enforcing the restrictive thesis (the abolished law: permanent legal resident, legal work, etc) to all the cases but they apply the valid law under my solicitude.
2) One of the cases at SC is from another jurisdiction.
3) The second case at SC is regarding a juridic legal mistake of the Chamber. The judge who rejected this case is retired now. I talked with the new judge and he agree with me, so, even if the case is not open by the SC, the reports are going to be granted.
4) The 4 ultra conservative/nationalist judges retired this year. They had the age to do it but they prefered to continue working. However, they couldn't stand the new Chamber's precedents recognizing rights to foreigners under an irregular immigration status. So, they decided to retire because of that.
5) Another 2 ultra conservative judges just changed their behaviour because I asked for sanctions at the chamber.
Regards