The 1st instance court rejected it which can, and I assume is being appealed, and my understanding, based on previous posts that he has made is that DNM can't deport someone for as long as there is an ongoing judicial case, and if they do, like he mentioned in the article, those officials can be criminally denounced.The article also says that Bajo Cero's request for an injunction was rejected.
A bunch of airlines are probably now regretting not having checked for return tickets now.
Even so, Migraciones could treat this as a humanitarian case and leave the women in, as long as they're not going to be wandering the streets without funds, which nobody will want to see happen.
Also, his specific client is stating she does not want to return to Russia for political reasons, and if she was infact trafficked here as part of a scheme (which again, DNM is saying they're aware of this being a thing targeting Russians with promises of citizenship) that's one of the cases which in which someone is eligible for temporary residence according to the DNM's own website People who have been victims of human trafficking or other forms of slave exploitation and/or victims of the illicit trafficking of migrants.
Like you said, expensive lesson for KLM and Ethiopian Airlines, they'll get fined I assume for not confirming onward travel.
The pregnant women in Ezeiza will be allowed to give birth in Argentina, due to the advance state of the pregnancy. Fifty eight hundred pregnant Russian women have entered the country since November?
I have to assume so, what airline is going to take an 8.5 month pregnant woman as a passenger? I assume she hid it well and the airline didn't know she was pregnant, most have a time limit.