jimdepalermo
Registered
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2008
- Messages
- 432
- Likes
- 206
To Chris and JoeGillis, let me say that I did not mean to imply any negative about the Met orchestra. It is indeed one of the very, very finest ensembles in the world today, in symphonic repertory as well as opera.
The point I was trying to make is that in classical music, it's all about budgets. And since ticket prices cover only a small fraction of the cost of performance, the remaining financing must come from public sources, donations, or earnings from endowments.
I think it's more reasonable to compare the work of companies with similar budgets. The Met operates with a budget a few times the size of the Colón's. Last year the Met recorded $182 million in contributions by wealthy donors - more than the Colón's entire budget, and even with that, they ran a deficit.
You also have to consider that the Colón's much smaller budget covers ballet performances, a separate symphonic orchestra, a guest-recital season, and a training conservatory, all of which are outside the scope of the Met's operations. (OK - the Met does 3 or 4 orchestral concerts a year, and yes - they're often astonishing.) Plus the Colón is hamstrung by Argentine labor rules and union practices, and, this being Argentina, we assume a degree of graft as well.
I was basically suggesting, indirectly, that we cut the Colón some slack. Given the size of their budget, they're not doing a bad job. And given the level of public funding available currently in cash-strapped Argentina, the only way to maintain even that standard of quality is with the higher ticket prices. Trust me - I don't like them any more than you do.
I'm just glad we have the opportunity to hear music performed at least competently in that splendid space! I'll be interested to see if this year's attendance is as high as last year's, given the steep price increases in the lower tiers of the house.
And to Chris, the level of playing by the BA Phil has indeed been improving in the last couple years - try to catch a concert with Diemecke playing Bruckner or Mahler in that incredible acoustic! I also agree with your comparison between Colón opera and New York City Opera. Unfortunately, New York City Opera realized that actually performing is more expensive than not performing, so they barely exist as a performing entity at this point. Let's hope the Colón doesn't try to learn the same lesson.
The point I was trying to make is that in classical music, it's all about budgets. And since ticket prices cover only a small fraction of the cost of performance, the remaining financing must come from public sources, donations, or earnings from endowments.
I think it's more reasonable to compare the work of companies with similar budgets. The Met operates with a budget a few times the size of the Colón's. Last year the Met recorded $182 million in contributions by wealthy donors - more than the Colón's entire budget, and even with that, they ran a deficit.
You also have to consider that the Colón's much smaller budget covers ballet performances, a separate symphonic orchestra, a guest-recital season, and a training conservatory, all of which are outside the scope of the Met's operations. (OK - the Met does 3 or 4 orchestral concerts a year, and yes - they're often astonishing.) Plus the Colón is hamstrung by Argentine labor rules and union practices, and, this being Argentina, we assume a degree of graft as well.
I was basically suggesting, indirectly, that we cut the Colón some slack. Given the size of their budget, they're not doing a bad job. And given the level of public funding available currently in cash-strapped Argentina, the only way to maintain even that standard of quality is with the higher ticket prices. Trust me - I don't like them any more than you do.
I'm just glad we have the opportunity to hear music performed at least competently in that splendid space! I'll be interested to see if this year's attendance is as high as last year's, given the steep price increases in the lower tiers of the house.
And to Chris, the level of playing by the BA Phil has indeed been improving in the last couple years - try to catch a concert with Diemecke playing Bruckner or Mahler in that incredible acoustic! I also agree with your comparison between Colón opera and New York City Opera. Unfortunately, New York City Opera realized that actually performing is more expensive than not performing, so they barely exist as a performing entity at this point. Let's hope the Colón doesn't try to learn the same lesson.