Corruption and and outright thievery are not OK, whoever commits it. But, to cite just one example, when a whistleblower revealed that Macri's brother took advantage of his brother's 'sinceramento fiscal' to launder 34 million dollars of hot money, I didn't see headline splashes about "Corrupción M" in Clarín. To be fair, La Nación published a little side piece on how an IT technician had been sacked for revealing tax secrets, but no details...
I think it should be clear to everyone who has lived for some time in this country that corruption is endemic across Argentine society. But the media here prefer to reveal corruption as if searching for it with a fine torch in a dark room, without ever just turning the light on and looking around.
Respectfully, I don't think that the 'he inherited a mess"/"pesada herencia" idea bears scrutiny. Macri inherited a country with no foreign debt, with poverty on a downward trajectory. Certainly the country had a range problems, but he didn't inherit a country in default, or with a mountain of debt or a run on the currency and millions pushed into poverty. In fact it was Nestor Kirchner who stabilised the country after the 2001 default. The history of Argentina in the last 40 years has been one of the "pesada herencia" of financial meltdowns, runs on the currency etc. created by the Menems and Macris of this world.
I'm not seeking to promote any particular line, but I think that the lessons from Macri's government are clear for Argentines, and that it's obvious why Alberto Fernandez will stomp home.
ask yourself these questions:
why was it macri didn't inherit a mountain of debt?
why was poverty lower? how were those social programs being paid for?
why do you think the exchange rate was "stable" during the K years?
FF probably will win, because unfortunately the population wants "futbol para todos" and subsidized electricity and on and on.