captainmcd said:I wonder how many of the critics have ever been to a tea party rally? It seems that they have been peaceful, unlike rallys by leftists who loot and burn businesses in the U.K. Saying that someone who disagrees with the president of the United States is a racist is like saying anyone who disagrees with CFK's policies is a sexist. The tea party is a diverse group of people who are not satisfied with the direction of the U.S. Of course there are some extremists in any movement, but that does not define the movement.
There certainly people in the movement that do advocate violence including overthrowing the government by force if they don't get their way. If these extremists aren't what the movement is about then why don't they denounce them and remove them from their membership rolls? Street thugs in the U.K. can't be compared to these people, who are trying with some success in setting the agenda of one of the two major parties in the U.S. The possibility of these people being put in charge of the government makes them 1000 more dangerous than the thugs in the U.K.
Here a link some of the calls for violence from the far right in the U.S.
http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2009/10/08/63166/anti-obama-violence/