In light of the various players' stances regarding Falklanders' right to self-determination, territorial integrity, etc - how do their stances re very similar issues in Crimea compare?
In light of the various players' stances regarding Falklanders' right to self-determination, territorial integrity, etc - how do their stances re very similar issues in Crimea compare?
This game is even more fun with Spaniards. Having them explain the difference between Gibraltar and Mélia/Ceuta is like having Nadia Comaneci do somersaults in your cranium. Good times.
It's like having ajknoblauch explain why he calls republicans the peronistas of the north if it's the democrats who want a welfare state and use the handouts for political gain.
This game is even more fun with Spaniards. Having them explain the difference between Gibraltar and Mélia/Ceuta is like having Nadia Comaneci do somersaults in your cranium. Good times.
In light of the various players' stances regarding Falklanders' right to self-determination, territorial integrity, etc - how do their stances re very similar issues in Crimea compare?
The Crimearans should have the right but doing shit in 2-3 weeks isn't how it should be done. Announce they are going to do it a yearish in advance and let people campaign for both sides.
It's like having ajknoblauch explain why he calls republicans the peronistas of the north if it's the democrats who want a welfare state and use the handouts for political gain.
It's like having ajknoblauch explain why he calls republicans the peronistas of the north if it's the democrats who want a welfare state and use the handouts for political gain.
That's a very simplistic comment, since the Democrats deal with such issues timidly and tentatively. The Republicans and Peronists, however, closely resemble each other in their determination to make their respective countries ungovernable.