Fascists in Palermo

Merlinova said:
Orwellian:

I really don't understand where are you getting your information from, but it looks like you have never read news from a news agency that is not control by Chavez's government. The only two type of people I have heard with such detachment from reality about the situation of my country are: Ultra-left fanatics or people making a fortune from Chavez's corrupt government.

What information, can you be a bit specific please? All I have done is pointed out several lies about Chavez. What is it you don't agree with me on?

Merlinova said:
If you are the first kind (Ultra left fanatic): good for you, nice that you believe in something with such passion, however, I don't understand why you don't move to Cuba or Venezuela and live like the common people, do your lines to get food, live without electricity, work on what the government allows you to work on. The good thing is that there is hope for you and you can start living the way you want to, please move to Cuba or Venezuela.

If you are the second kind (people making a fortune from Chavez's corrupt government): There is no point of arguing with you, you would never want to live in either country, you would never admit to the truth, you will always defend (with no reason) your generous benefactor.

The old classic argument: "If you don't like it, move to Cuba". There are several reasons why I don't want to move there. Also, I'd like to make it clear that I am not a supporter of the government of Cuba or Venezuela.


Merlinova said:
Either way I'll develop my idea a little:

About Chavez being a hypocrite? Don't you think that the fact the he keeps providing the US with almost all our oil production makes him a hypocrite? What's worst than that?

Wow, finally some valid critique. And no I don't agree with you that that would make him a hypocrite. He is under a lot of pressure from the United States as it is, remember the coup attempt of 2002? I think the U.S would consider it a major problem if he didn't sell oil to them. If he had the choice, I am sure he would sell it to anyone but the U.S.
And why not reverse your argument? If the U.S thinks that Chavez is such a dictator, why do they buy oil from him?


Merlinova said:
Ah, also please take a look to this "alternative" choice given by the president regarding the energy crisis Venezuela in going through (http://www.ww4report.com/node/7947). Regardless the fact that we have one of the biggest Hydroelectric Plants in the world (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guri_Dam).

There is an energy crisis in Brazil as well. I don't hear you right wing fanatics complaining about that. And the Guri Dam isn't producing much electricity because of the water shortage, something you can hardly blame Chavez for. Although he should obviously have had a backup plan for that.

Merlinova said:
http://www.globovision.com/news.php?nid=132158 do you think this is a president to look up to? to be proud of?

Provide me with some text and I will read it, I am not a big fan of private Venezuelan TV channels.

Merlinova said:
Guri, by the way, was planed by one of the presidents (Raul Leoni) that according with the Venezuelan history you are reading, truly ruined our country. Can you name one big project Chavez has put together? With all the money Venezuela has right now?

The Chávez government has greatly increased social spending, including spending on health care,
subsidized food, and education. The state oil company alone was responsible for $13.3 billion (7.3
percent of GDP) of social spending in 2006.

The most pronounced difference has been in the area of health care. In 1998 there were 1,628
primary care physicians
for a population of 23.4 million. Today, there are 19,571 for a population of
27 million. In 1998 there were 417 emergency rooms, 74 rehab centers and 1,628 primary care
centers
compared to 721 emergency rooms, 445 rehab centers and 8,621 primary care centers
(including the 6,500 “check-up points,” usually in poor neighborhoods, and that are in the process
of being expanded to more comprehensive primary care centers) today. Since 2004, 399,662 people
have had eye operations that restored their vision
. In 1999, there were 335 HIV patients receiving
antiretroviral treatment from the government, compared to 18,538 in 2006.

The Venezuelan government has also provided widespread access to subsidized food. By 2006, there
were 15,726 stores throughout the country that offered mainly food items at subsidized prices
(with
average savings of 27 percent and 39 percent compared to market prices in 2005 and 2006,
respectively). These plus expanded special programs for the extremely poor (e.g., soup kitchens
and food distribution) benefited an average of 67 percent and 43 percent of the population in 2005
and 2006 respectively. These do not include the 1.8 million children that were beneficiaries of a
school food program in 2006, compared with 252,000 children in 1999.

Access to education has also increased substantially. For example, the number of public schools in
the country has increased by 3,620 from 17,122
in the 1999/2000 school year to 20,873 in the
2004/2005 school year. By comparison, in the period between the 1994/1995 and 1998/1999
school years, the number of public schools increased by 915. School enrollment has also increased
at all educational levels. For example, in the period between the 1999/2000 and 2005/2006 school
years, gross enrollment rates for preschool have increased by 25 percent, for primary education by
8.3 percent, for secondary education by 45 percent and for higher education by 44 percent. Over
one million people also participated in adult literacy programs.

http://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q...ocx4ug&sig=AHIEtbSIqzkxoHcavWP9ujFfx3iQ2I_caw

But maybe helping the poor of Venezuela is not an accomplishment in your eyes? Maybe you rather have them starving and use them for cheap labor?


Merlinova said:
Another big project executed by these presidents you mentioned, (the ones according to you, were really destroying my country), was SIDOR (Siderúrgica del Orinoco), founded in 1953. This company actually was bought by Techint group in 1997 (60%). They, as one of the biggest steel-makers in the world, took over the company making it very productive. Chavez re-nationalized the company in 2008. He fired all the people that had worked for/with the "argentineans" (as he calls techint/ternium workers), and finger-pointed all the managers straight from his government, politics' people not steel makers). Right now half of the production lines have been shot down. They have had 3 fatal accidents since Venezuela took over the company back. How do I know this? because I used to work there.

And how many fatalities did they have prior to that? 3 doesn't sound very high. Also, I can't really comment on the productivity in a company you used to work for. I do know how the opposition totally ruined the whole country's economy to try to get rid of Chavez. For example well paid workers in the state owned oil company PDVSA went on strike and sabotaged the machinery. It wouldn't surprise me if the very same thing happened in your company as well.

Merlinova said:
That's also why I know the people that are working there haven't been payed in the last three months. Why? well since half of the plant has been shot down, they have nothing to sell. Initially though, they were subsidized by PDVSA's (the oil company) money, however, PDVSA is running out of money as well. He did the same with the oil company back in 2003-2004. Hi fired all the people had worked there for more than 30 years. And now we are lacking people with enough experience to run these kinds of companies. And since Chavez has taken over all the companies in Venezuela (CANTV, PDVSA, EDELCA among others) you do the math.

Workers haven't been paid? Do you have a source for that? I can't find anything about it in google besides a strike in 98. And he fired the workers at PDVSA because they went on strike. Not because of them wanting higher salaries, but for them to ruin the economy by stopping the oil production and destabilizing the country to be able to get rid of Chavez. Are you seriously blaming him for that?

Merlinova said:
Chavez is just using socialism as a political flag to keep being the president . Why is that "socialists" are so obsessed with having long presidential periods? Doesn't that make them monarchy like? What's "social" about?

The social part is obviously what he has done for the poor. Please see my previous post.

Merlinova said:
Finally and just to be clear, I answered to your post not because I though you deserved my opinion; you were not polite at all. I just wanted to be sure the rest of the people in this forum have a first hand opinion about what's really going on in Venezuela.

That's because you speak English and have an Internet connection, which the majority of Venezuelans don't do or have. What about all the people who vote for him in every election? He keeps winning them by landslides. Don't kid yourself into thinking that you represent the people of Venezuela. The only thing you represent is the white middle class who have been enjoying the benefits of the oil production for yourselves. Those days are over now thanks to Chavez. And every time you come here complaining about it you will hear from me.


gouchobob said:
If you have been following the news out of Venezuela its appears Hugo starting to do away with even the appearance that the country is a democracy.

http://www.economist.com/world/americas/displaystory.cfm?story_id=15393502

I have already debated you on that. What's new in that article that I haven't already replied to? All your doing is bringing up the same old arguments.
 
pericles said:
Freedom of the press is laughable as it does not exist anywhere in the world and all views and opinions are controlled to create the desired effect in the populace.

In some sense you are correct, but I think you overlook the fact this very forum and others like it are a "press".

As far as I can tell, there's plenty of freedom in media today when you take into account the internet. Obviously there are problems of access, quality, etc. but those are separate issue.

Media - You're soaking in it.
 
orwellian said:
Just visited Palermo district the other day for the first time and I noticed there are fascist graffiti all over the place.
Says "Ni Marxistas, Ni Liberales, Vanguardia" something.

Are these violent fascists? Something to worry about?

The whole thing really sickens me, especially because of the history of Argentina.

¿Especialmente por la historia de Argentina? :confused:

Perdón, pero que yo sepa la historia de Argentina es mucho más pacífica que la de los países de los que vienen ustedes...

Por empezar las etnias amerindias vivían de manera bastante armónica, de hecho la ausencia de guerras es lo que los mantenía "atrasados", si hubieran tenido que luchar y competir entre sí como pasó en los otros continentes, hubieran construido ciudades amuralladas, desarrollado armas más complejas y destructivas, etc... en otras palabras desde el punto de vista europeo: se hubieran "civilizado"

Lamentablemente el desarrollo va de la mano de la guerra, por eso no es casualidad que los países que han estado involucrados en las más grandes guerras sean los más desarrollados...

Por otro lado los españoles no aniquilaron por completo a los amerindios como en otras partes... el mestizaje es la prueba!

Argentina nunca fue un país imperialista... fue una colonia, por lo tanto no invadimos ningún territorio ajeno, todo lo contrario... este fue el territorio invadido ;)

Entre los países de América del Sur a pesar de ser jóvenes y de que muchas etnias amerindias como los quechuas, araucanos, guaraníes, etc... fueron separadas por límites imaginarios nunca hubo grandes luchas o atentados para lograr la anexión de territorios o creación de nuevos países como ha sucedido en otras partes del mundo...

En Alemania Hitler quería anexar todos los territorios de raza germánica... en cambio un mapuche argentino está orgulloso de ser argentino y un mapuche chileno está orgulloso de ser chileno, a ninguno se le ha ocurrido armar una guerra para unificar su raza... ni tampoco ninguno arroja bombas en lugares públicos para lograr su independencia como hacen en algunos lugares de Europa...

Argentina no participó de ninguna guerra mundial... tampoco le lanzamos bombas nucleares a gente inocente ni vamos a robarles recursos naturales a ningún país como han hecho otros...

Así que la historia argentina no tiene porque preocuparte... somos Caperucita Roja a comparación del resto del mundo ;)

Me molesta cuando hablan de los países sudamericanos como si fueramos salvajes...

Y lo escribo en español, porque antes de juzgar deberían empezar por conocer el idioma... ;)
 
Lamentablemente el desarrollo va de la mano de la guerra, por eso no es casualidad que los países que han estado involucrados en las más grandes guerras sean los más desarrollados...

It amazes me that there are still people in this 21st century who voluntarily go to war. Wars have always been an instrument to increase the country's productivity without having to pay for it...everyone working long hours, on weekends, etc etc just because "we are at war". Not to mention those who are at the front!

Fascists in Buenos Aires? Sure, like everywhere else around the World.
 
almagestos said:
¿Especialmente por la historia de Argentina? :confused:

Perdón, pero que yo sepa la historia de Argentina es mucho más pacífica que la de los países de los que vienen ustedes...

Por empezar las etnias amerindias vivían de manera bastante armónica, de hecho la ausencia de guerras es lo que los mantenía "atrasados", si hubieran tenido que luchar y competir entre sí como pasó en los otros continentes, hubieran construido ciudades amuralladas, desarrollado armas más complejas y destructivas, etc... en otras palabras desde el punto de vista europeo: se hubieran "civilizado"

Lamentablemente el desarrollo va de la mano de la guerra, por eso no es casualidad que los países que han estado involucrados en las más grandes guerras sean los más desarrollados...

Por otro lado los españoles no aniquilaron por completo a los amerindios como en otras partes... el mestizaje es la prueba!

Argentina nunca fue un país imperialista... fue una colonia, por lo tanto no invadimos ningún territorio ajeno, todo lo contrario... este fue el territorio invadido ;)

Entre los países de América del Sur a pesar de ser jóvenes y de que muchas etnias amerindias como los quechuas, araucanos, guaraníes, etc... fueron separadas por límites imaginarios nunca hubo grandes luchas o atentados para lograr la anexión de territorios o creación de nuevos países como ha sucedido en otras partes del mundo...

En Alemania Hitler quería anexar todos los territorios de raza germánica... en cambio un mapuche argentino está orgulloso de ser argentino y un mapuche chileno está orgulloso de ser chileno, a ninguno se le ha ocurrido armar una guerra para unificar su raza... ni tampoco ninguno arroja bombas en lugares públicos para lograr su independencia como hacen en algunos lugares de Europa...

Argentina no participó de ninguna guerra mundial... tampoco le lanzamos bombas nucleares a gente inocente ni vamos a robarles recursos naturales a ningún país como han hecho otros...

Así que la historia argentina no tiene porque preocuparte... somos Caperucita Roja a comparación del resto del mundo ;)

Me molesta cuando hablan de los países sudamericanos como si fueramos salvajes...

Y lo escribo en español, porque antes de juzgar deberían empezar por conocer el idioma... ;)

No estaba hablando de esto si no la historia de la dictadura. Queria decir que no me gusta ver graffiti fascista en un pais que sufrio una dictadura fascista muy violenta. No fue un intento de juzgar a nadie.
 
Well, regarding the topic of this post, there is no "fascism" in the way of band of racists beating up blacks, jews, or anything similar.
Matt, please, can you explain me more that thing about Peron and the "fish"?
 
Perdon no se quien lanzo una bomba atomica a gente inocente, me perdí algo?
Que yo sepa, las unicas bombas de ese tipo fueron usadas contra dos ciudades que pertenecian a un pais militarista que estaba en guerra con todos sus vecinos.
Los japoneses atacaron Okinawa, Korea, Manchuria, China, Indochina; y luego en 1941 a los E$EUU, Gran Bretaña, Australia e Indonesia.
Dificilmente se los podria categorizar como gente inocente, ignorante.
 
HenryNisental said:
Perdon no se quien lanzo una bomba atomica a gente inocente, me perdí algo?
Que yo sepa, las unicas bombas de ese tipo fueron usadas contra dos ciudades que pertenecian a un pais militarista que estaba en guerra con todos sus vecinos.
Los japoneses atacaron Okinawa, Korea, Manchuria, China, Indochina; y luego en 1941 a los E$EUU, Gran Bretaña, Australia e Indonesia.
Dificilmente se los podria categorizar como gente inocente, ignorante.

Not only that, they simply refused to stop fighting. One of the thoughts at the time was that it would cost hundreds of thousands of more Allied lives (a goodly percentage American) if we tried to invade the islands. The fighting was particularly gory against the Japanese. It was expected that every man, woman and child in the Japanese islands would fight.

But the Argentines wouldn't know much about all that, perhaps. Their future leader Peron, who was a fan of Mussolini (remember the fascist leader in Italy who was also Hitler's buddy?), was at the time involved in the military overthrow of the previously very corrupt civilian government.

That somewhat explains why Argentina didn't get around to declaring war against the Axis until March 1945 (when Germany was all that was left in Europe, fighting between the pincers of the Allies and Russia and about to collapse), but was that the whole reason? After all, Argentina was one of the world's leading havens for Nazi war criminals after the war, under explicit protection from Peron.

Maybe it's like Malbec thinks and Argentina didn't like the thought of going to war at all, and wanted to help whoever needed to escape because they love all mankind?

But then there's those pesky Malvinas...did the peoples of the Malvinas really want to be "rescued" by the Argentines?

BTW - Argentina in the 1860s was one of three countries that destroyed a small country, who admittedly started the fight, and helped kill as much as 90% (the exact number is unknowable) of the male population in the War of the Triple Alliance. I'm sure the Paraguayans (some of whom still "remember" the lack of men - tales handed down through their families - and continues to this day to affect their society) didn't care that it wasn't an atomic bomb that killed those men. Nor the other indigenes and black slaves that were slaughtered over the years at the hands of the Argentines.

My point here is not to say that Argentina is evil and horrible, but just to point out that we are all humans and every freaking country in the world has its problems. Some acknowledge it and others deny it.
 
Back
Top