According to experts, it is better to have one and do not needet than need it and do not have one.
Don't you think those same "experts" would agree that it's better to have a permit to have one than not to have one (which also makes you a criminal, and, as a foreigner, possibly subject to deportation, even if the sentence was only two years of probation)?
PS: I used the word "possibly" subject to deportation because I am not sure if migraciones will actually take that action, A couple years ago mc kenna posted that he had permanent residency, left the country for 25 years and returned to Argentina without any problem.
Though that would not be possible now, I wonder how likely it will be that migraciones will take any action while mc kenna is "serving" his two year probational sentence.
If he had temporary residency I'm sure it would not be renewed,
Dr. Rubliar recently posted that a convicted criminal (foreigner) who is incarcerated could ask to be deported after serving half his sentence.
Even though mc kenna is not incarcerated, he's made it clear he plans to leave Argentina at the end off his two years of probation.
I wonder if he could expedite his own departure if he asks to be deported at the end of the first year of his sentence.
If Dr. Rubilar is now honoring mc kenna's request not to "talk" to him , he (Dr Rubilar) is welcome to tell me the answer.
I'll make sure mc kenna gets it.