Seriously??
Yes... surprisingly enough I have heard of Foster Parents. A great friend of mine fosters teenage children. And I really don't think it has anything to do with the point I made - se estan llendo al carajo!
Children are usually fostered out a) because their biological parents require a respite due to illness, behavioural problems, personal issues, etc - with the view of later being returned to these parents or b) because they are awaiting a permanent placement (aka: adoption). Foster children move from foster parent to foster parent or from foster parent to a children's home or from a foster parent to independent living (when they reach 18, I think, in the UK) or from a foster parent to an adoptive parent. Foster parents have to meet stringent requirements to foster a child and when that child's time is up with that particular parent (for whatever reason), they are not then deposited on the streets or placed for re-adoption on Craigslist! There is a system in place to protect them (all be it a flawed system). Most people would also agree that a permanent home with loving parents is usually a far better option for a child than a lifetime moving from one temporary family to the next. Unfortunately, for many older children or children with special needs, temporary homes are the only ones available. This doesn't exist for animals in any way, shape or form.
The comparison I was actually trying to make was that it would be completely unacceptable (and cruel) for me to drive around Retiro, spot myself a cute-looking street kid, take him home, clean him up, feed him, clothe him and love him for 18 months and then, when it was time for me to go back home to the UK, decide that it was financially or personally inconvenient to take him back, so try to pile him off on somewhere else or leave him behind. That was the point I was making...one which has nothing to do with an established foster care system.
Perhaps if an expat had "fostered" an older cat or a cat with problems for a while before releasing it back into a system of other foster cat parents, there wouldn't be a problem. But that's unlikely to be the case, is it?
The problem arises when an expat "adopts" a baby animal (which has a higher chance of finding a permanent home while it's still young and cute) and then decides that it can't commit to providing a permanent home later...when, chances are, no one is going to want it now that it's older. Is my point really so difficult to understand?
Also, like I said numerous times, I'm not commenting on Anushka's particular situation as I don't know it! Perhaps the cat was dumped on her, perhaps it followed her home, perhaps it was in danger or perhaps she went to a rescue centre and adopted it because it was cute at the time and didn't think about a long-term commitment...I have no idea. I was merely commenting on a practice that I know goes on among some expats here and that I think is ultimately detrimental to the animal. End of.
UOTE=bradlyhale;68938]You seem to be very disconnected from reality. Regarding children, you live in a city where many don't have Moms or Dads. It's particularly problematic in the villas miserias. Wouldn't you agree that any stable home is better than no home at all, even if it's temporary? Let's stop being holier-than-thou for a second and think about the alternative.
Have you ever heard of foster children? How do you feel about foster parents? You know, those people who take homeless kids in on a temporary basis? Are they horrible people who only take in children for some warm fuzzies? Or should these kids just stay in orphanages or remain homeless?
If Anushka had not taken the cat, where would she have gone? What if she never found a home? Would the cat be wandering the streets, eating scraps from trash? Would she have been put down? Hit by a colectivo?
Geesh, some people will find a reason to complain about anything.[/QUOTE]