camberiu
Registered
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2012
- Messages
- 3,880
- Likes
- 4,612
I saw the footage of the Apache attack when it was first leaked. The cameraman running around buildings, peeking around corners holding a large camera on his shoulder certainly could be ID'd as a guy with a rocket launcher. I remember thinking at the time that it looked like a launcher to me, he looked like he was setting up for a launch, and I'm a trained combat pilot sitting in my chair after the fact without anyone shooting at me. As tragic as these two events were the airliner shoot down is an indictable offense. The Apache attack might be depending upon whether the crew followed correct procedures.
The issue was never that they confused the camera with a rocket launcher. The issue was 2 fold:
1) That once it was discovered that the "insurgents" were nothing but civilians and the Reuters camera crew, the US military tried to cover up the incident. Reuters repeatedly tried to find out what happen to their crew and the US military kept giving them wrong info, implying that they were attacked by insurgents. Only after the video was leaked did Reuters have real confirmation of what happened to its crew.
2) Attacking first responders and rescuers is clearly outside the Rules of Engagement, and it is also considered a war crime, violating articles 3 and 17 of the Geneva Convention. yet, the helicopter crew never faced any charges.
Manning himself expressed several times that he felt that his fellow military men showed complete disregard for the lives of the civilians in Iraq.
And yet, the video, showing Iraqui civilians and children being gunned down by a US 30mm chaingun desined to stop Soviet armor, generated a lot less outrage than the Trayvon Martin case. How do you explain that, besides admitting that for most of the US public, the lives of Iraqis have no value?