So far from 'wrong', it seems that you agree with just about everything I wrote.
You appear to agree that 500 revocations sound ridiculous, in fact you imply that this can only take place in a culture of impunity.
You agree that the facts of the case are unclear. Aside from the clear temptation to write, 'wrong, as usual', what exactly was I wrong about?
Except the first quote about ridiculous, which you seem not to have understood. Surely a court clerk signed some things properly, aside from what she did improperly. If all of her signatures become suspect, surely there will be collateral damage.
Moreover, as Clarin reports, all the applicants now in limbo were considered by the juzgado in Cordoba to have acted in good faith. So again, we return to what I'd said: unless either these revocations are reversed or unless some other shoe drops, this episode does not inspire confidence in the Argentine legal system.