[generic insults]
The subject is between the the UK and Argentina.
The subject was, because you seem to have forgotten, that the UK puts up more bureaucratic hurdles to a process they supposedly allow for, than does Argentina for the same process.
In that context, the relevance of a country being a monarchy or republic is the same as your handle on this forum - subzero.
Once you broadened it to a question of allegiance to a state, to then complain about broadening the premise to include other countries (and thus putting your prior nonsense into relief), is ridiculous. Then again, so are you.
There are no duties wuth the State in the Democratic Republic of Argentina and to defendt it is a right not a duty.
Has anyone ever heard of the word “Democratic” appearing in this country’s formal name?
Last I heard, it was called “Republica Argentina” which in English is usually translated as either the Republic of Argentina or the Argentine Republic. (Given that in its passports the French “Republique Argentine” is used, the latter sounds more correct - “Argentina” is a adjective qualifying “Republic”.)
Regardless, there is not a long list of countries with “Democratic” or “People’s” in their name, they all share some common traits. And while I understand bajo’s desire to get Argentina into that illustrious club, i am not sure how many share that sentiment.
That aside, dual citizenship and the allowance or disallowance thereof is all about allegiance to the state. But keep on pretending not to know that.
And no duties toward the state - huh? There is no law concerning treason in this country?
but to show a foreign passport is an evidence of tacit rennounce of the Ar citizenship, so, only an idiot and do that or advice that. Ups, sorry, it was you?
No, actually, it was and is your government, for the last 20 years. The current guidance is
here, the relevant disposición is
here.
You seem to continually suspect your own government of trying to entrap people.
Meanwhile, in the real world, this has happened precisely never - an Argentine resident abroad entering on a foreign passport gets a stamp “ARGENTINO - 180 DÍAS” and can leave during the next 180 days on that foreign passport.
This is standard procedure, and happens on a regular basis with more than one person whom I know personally.
You, on the other hand, declined with all sorts of ridiculous excuses to name one solitary case when the fire things you are warning of - to wit, where a non-resident Argentine entered the country on a foreign passport and had any adverse consequences - choosing instead to throw in countless red herrings. And expect for some weird reason to still be taken seriously.
