Nisman Dead!

[Pensador]

Did you choose your nickname?

That was a direct question Doc did you count the votes? If not how do you know it was 53%?

Then again maybe the Doc was to busy paying the poor to vote K to help his task master and get his inroads in the crony network.

Another question smart Doc. Lawyer guy what percentage of the votes were paid for?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BCsCNHDSUPI

 

[jbeas176]

by the way, that's what I just explained. thanks for the confirmation. special forces do use 22 suppressed weapons. I would in covert operations when you know how to shoot.

 

[jbeas176]

we are saying the same thing. a gun is never good. 22 caliber may be more available. its a question of whether he killed himself or was murdered. I was trying to show why he was murdered in a simple format

 

[ajoknoblauch]

That was a direct question Doc did you count the votes? If not how do you know it was 53%?

Then again maybe the Doc was to busy paying the poor to vote K to help his task master and get his inroads in the crony network.

Another question smart Doc. Lawyer guy what percentage of the votes were paid for?

https://www.youtube....h?v=BCsCNHDSUPI

How does any single person know the accuracy of any election with any precision? I'm no CFK fan, and not an Argentine for that matter, but I found her re-election more than plausible. When sophisticated predictions such as Nate Silver's at http://fivethirtyeight.com come so close to the results of the US elections, I find both even more plausible. Ultimately, we have to accept those results, but that doesn't mean we have to accept everything their government does.

 

[ben]

Not always a fan of the Daily Beast, but I found this article to be pretty solid. The solid quote from the start:

The circumstances revealed thus far by the police suggest a suicide. The history of Iran’s operations overseas inevitably suggest otherwise.

Assuming this suicide is probably less than a suicide is hardly confirmation bias and simply a matter of statistics when covering contorversial high-profile 'suicides'. At some point skepticism and even assumptions are in order.

Could it have been truly a suicide? I suppose so. Does the sum total of the available evidence leave a neutral-but-savvy-observer to suppose that that was not the case here? For me, obviously so. Then again, reasonable people (on this thread only Magico qualifies so far as I remember) seem to disagree.

 

[Pensador]

How does any single person know the accuracy of any election with any precision? I'm no CFK fan, and not an Argentine for that matter, but I found her re-election more than plausible. When sophisticated predictions such as Nate Silver's at http://fivethirtyeight.com come so close to the results of the US elections, I find both even more plausible. Ultimately, we have to accept those results, but that doesn't mean we have to accept everything their government does.

The point I was getting at is that Argentina is by no mean a real democracy. Everything is utterly corrupted from the in poverty voters to the elected officials. Vote buying by my standards should be enough to get life in the slammer without parole. But then again I am an idealist.

 

[semigoodlookin]

I personally think it was suicide, case closed. A lot of people do not though and that kind of shows what a scumbag this president is when the first thought is for people to think she got him killed... she's not held in high regard is she.

 

[Dublin2BuenosAires]

I don't qualify as anything.

I'd like to see those so called statistics for Iranian stealth assasinations. I don't think they exist.

I'd say it is as plausible that Iran decided that after 15 years of watching this guy investigate they better bump him off at the most sensitive time possible to create as much suspicion as possible, in a moment when in geo-political terms they are on the brink of "coming into the fold".

Is that more plausible than the explanation Bradly has provided you? Using logic and assumption?

Not for me, each to their own of course.

 

[Dublin2BuenosAires]

The election process in Argentina is completely solid. The issue is how those ballot box decisions are made, however that is hardly unique to Argentina.

Buying votes (one assumes you mean via social plans etc) vs corporate influence in US politics? Which is the more damaged process? I would argue the duopoly of large corporations pulling the strings via their chosen political party, shaping policy and buying elections is worse in the US.

 

[Bajo_cero2]

Define "PURE" Argentine.

Ask Ariel81 about that.