Nisman Dead!

[Rich One]

https://www.youtube....h?v=xC2V8mwQ2r8

Doman: "Yo esperaba más de esas 290 páginas."

Longobardi: "Yo coincido con la presidente que la denuncia de Nisman no era lo que esperábamos."

Even journalists from Grupo Clarín say his criminal complaint was weak.... Then you know it must REALLY be bad.

Doman and Longobardi, 2 TV conductors to review a Legal Complaint B) , .... Nisman was a brilliant Jurist that devoted more than 10 years to the AMIA Cause.

 

[Bajo_cero2]

Doman and Longobardi, 2 TV conductors to review a Legal Complaint B) , .... Nisman was a brilliant Jurist that devoted more than 10 years to the AMIA Cause.

That's the point.

He could never be who wrote that.

There is no a single crime described, even a law student of the first year can see a non-justiciable political decision.

The problem with the causa AMIA is that it was coup by the secret services these 10 years, and you see what happends, they were investigating whatever (they pretend they were investigating, but they were hidding the true diverting the research).

Let's have some memmory: Menem concealed the Syrian track:

http://periodicotrib...ista-siria.html

http://www.bolinfode...ad_atentado.htm

Does somebody remember Al Kazzar?

http://en.wikipedia....onzer_al-Kassar

Can somebody explain me WTF was this guy doing here protected by the government of Menem?

The Israel's fomer embassador said that the responsible were in the other world but all the "suspect" of the argentine justice are alive.

Perhaps because they have nothing to do with this.

CIA and Mossad coup the investigation of AMIA through Stiusso and guess what: Iran is responsible.

Too much politics but the criminal investigation is a bad joke.

 

[Bajo_cero2]

This one is good:

 

[sesamosinsal]

Doman and Longobardi, 2 TV conductors to review a Legal Complaint B) , .... Nisman was a brilliant Jurist that devoted more than 10 years to the AMIA Cause.

Did you read any of the complaint?

Honestly, I got through 50 pages, and thought, "OK, and?" It was pretty dull. Some of it had already been debunked, such as the Nisman's claim that the government tried to lift the "red notices" -- http://www.telam.com.ar/english/notas/201501/4190-nisman-had-said-that-former-interpol-head-thwarted-an-agreement-of-impunity-with-iran.html

On Friday, Timerman informed that he had communicated with former secretary general of Interpol between 2003 through 2014, and that Noble ratified that the Argentine Government never tried to lift the red notices.

Noble wrote that “while I was secretary general of Interpol, in each occasion that you and I talked or met in relation to the AMIA case, you always pointed out that the red notices should continue in effect. Your position and that of the Argentine Government were consistent and firm”.

 

[Johnny]

I read his article in Haaretz. https://www.google.c... Nisman’s death

(If I post the link directly, I think you'll hit a paywall).

It was an awful read. He's a journalist, yet he presents no proof that the people following him -- if they were indeed following him -- were government agents. And even if they were, it seems like these SIDE guys get to do just about whatever they want anyway.

My favorite line:



You believe that your life was threatened; you allegedly flee the country because of said threats; and in your first few articles about the incident, you talk about how many Twitter followers you have instead of presenting evidence that corroborates your claims that the government was behind this?

Will a real journalist in Argentina PLEASE stand up, or do they all suffer Nismanitis?

Another lightweight publicity seeking amateur. Throw a stone in any direction these days and you'll hit one. Most alarming and depressing.

And/or as Bajo_Cero mentioned, another Intelligence flunky.

 

[Bajo_cero2]

Nice, the guy who gave him the gun was recognized as an infiltrated by the victims of Cromagnon while the PSA (airport police) stated that he offered his services as informant.

http://www.perfil.com/mobile/?nota=/contenidos/2015/01/27/noticia_0036.html

 

[Johnny]

Nice, the guy who gave him the gun was recognized as an infiltrated by the victims of Cromagnon while the PSA (airport police) stated that he offered his services as informant.

http://www.perfil.co...ticia_0036.html

I suppose no testing was done to determine if there was gunpowder residue on this fellow's hands. He was the last to see Nisman alive, visited frequently in Nisman's last few days and has what many would consider to be a checkered past related to Intelligence services. In addition, if one follows the line of murder rather than suicide then why were there no signs of struggle or resistance found on Nisman's body ? The possible answer would be that he knew the assailant and had no fear or suspicion of him.

Murky business and one can't help but think that the "investigation" has already been compromised by ineptitude or a factor more sinister.

 

[Dublin2BuenosAires]

Regarding AMIA, as has been hinted, you can be damn sure that if the Israeli's had half an idea of who was responsible they'd have killed them. They tend not to be too patient when it comes to eliminating suspects. They laugh at the idea of waiting for Argentina and Iran to come up with a patsy.

This investigation has been chasing it's tale since 94.

What strikes me as completely pathetic is the lengths FpV and their aparatchiks let themselves be led a merry dance by the Iranians, who only ever wanted to look like willing collaborators knowing full well they were covering for one of their affiliates. Throw a few fatays at intellectual heavyweights like D'Elia and you've got them onside. My guess is Iran know who was involved, they didn't want to give them up as they were useful regional allies. They blew smoke up the ars3s of the govt for so long that no one ever touched the truth. Nisman sniffed around and got enough dirt on someone to get himself offed. Nothing to do with finding the guilty in the AMIA case, but he got to close to some serious dirt.

I doubt we'll ever know who killed Nisman, but we know for sure that the govt are prepared to lie, change their story, prejudice the investigation, diminish the indepence of the investigate, besmirch whoever they want and basically act like they haven't the slightest regard for due process.

Any state which wants to be taken seriously cannot allow it's self to be informally represented by D'Elia. Surely?

We can clearly see the intellectually deficient manner in which we're governed. If the SI 's structure was a problem, why have you sat on it for a decade? Do we have to be permanently in crisis mode, slapping together legisaltion in response to the latest blunder?

 

[glasgowjohn]

Intellectual heavyweights like D'Elia ....

just brilliant!

 

[Rich One]

Intellectual heavyweights like D'Elia ....

just brilliant!

Amor Amor Amor acting of D'elia

https://www.youtube....h?v=zNZZ2W2TbmY

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lPbCq9ol8Pc

ODIO ODIO ODIO...!!