Soldiers who should face a firing squad before they die of natural causes

For those who don't know the history of the Montoneros - this wiki leak (albeit very superficial) should give a sense of the climate in Argentina leading up to the junta.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Montoneros

Not nice people to put it mildly. Bombings, assasintations, kidnapping for ransom of extranjeros, murder, hijackings.
 
Its amazing to see people here defend the military that raped and tortured pregnant women by giving electric discharges to fetuses (this is real and docummented).
And its also amazing that people keep comparing isolated (or may be not isolated) terrorist acts with a centrally organized system by the government at the time used to kill, torture, "dissapear" any dissenting voices, and kidnap their children, which is what ended happening in those years.

You are touching a subject that's painfull to a lot of people, you'd better

1. Show proper respect to the victims and families
2. Get informed before posting ignorant drivel out of your collective asses.
 
Its amazing to see people here defend the military that raped and tortured pregnant women by giving electric discharges to fetuses (this is real and docummented).
And its also amazing that people keep comparing isolated (or may be not isolated) terrorist acts with a centrally organized system by the government at the time used to kill, torture, "dissapear" any dissenting voices, and kidnap their children, which is what ended happening in those years.

You are touching a subject that's painfull to a lot of people, you'd better

1. Show proper respect to the victims and families
2. Get informed before posting ignorant drivel out of your collective asses.
Who in the World is defending the military criminals???
Not because someone did something worse we should forgive the terrorists for what they did. It's like pretending that Polpot (sp?) is innocent of any crime just because he killed less people than Stalin!
 
Amargo said:
Who in the World is defending the military criminals???
Not because someone did something worse we should forgive the terrorists for what they did. It's like pretending that Polpot (sp?) is innocent of any crime just because he killed less people than Stalin!

I meant those justifying military actions because "it would have turned into another Nicaragua".

Myself I'm don't justify, neither the terrorist nor the military.
But a government is not judged in the same way as an individual.
 
LAtoBA said:
In English we call this hyperbole. I doubt very seriously he meant it literally.
I meant every word. I am not against the death penalty for certain crimes and those commited by Videla and his co-conspirators qualify. The death penalty can easily be justifed.
 
random said:
What about Mario Firmenich? He's walking free --- his crimes are never discussed.

This is too one-sided. That's why I don't think this is about "justice," it's about selective vengeance. And feelings of hatred and vengeance don't help the nation heal.

If my child had been stolen --- well, first of all, I would probably have been killed so I wouldn't be thinking anything. But if a family member's child had been stolen, I would hope that the child had been raised in a loving home and was now a healthy, well-adjusted adult.

You have to be a troll. Nobody is that stupid.
 
Guillo said:
I meant those justifying military actions because "it would have turned into another Nicaragua".

Myself I'm don't justify, neither the terrorist nor the military.
But a government is not judged in the same way as an individual.

If you are referring to my post, read it again...slowly if necessary... I in no way justified the ruthless excesses of the military.

Was action justified? Yes, made necessary by the war of insurrection launched against the state of Argentina. Not to have done so would have resulted in anarchy or worse.


However, Captured guerrillas should have been tried for their crimes or placed in POW camps rather than tortured and executed without trial.

And nothing justifies torturing and killing innocents or stealing babies.

I see nothing disrespectful to the victims of these atrocities to talk about the role of armed bands of terrorist guerrillas in precipitating the tragic events that followed. What would be disrespectful would be to ignore precipitating events and to fail to learn lessons from this part of history.
 
dr__dawggy said:
Was action justified? Yes, made necessary by the war of insurrection launched against the state of Argentina. Not to have done so would have resulted in anarchy or worse.

Or so you say. The "war on insurrection" is a excuse they still use.
I cant talk about their "reason to start". I'm talking about what really happened. And it was NOTHING like a civil war. I was an organized state torturing, raping and killing everyone they wanted, just because they could.

Really, you need to get your facts right. I feel like a jew trying to convince someone that an holocaust existed.
 
dr__dawggy said:
What were the circumstances that led to the military take over of the government and the "dirty war" that followed?

There was no dirty war. I insist.

The conflic began many years ago when the farmers overthrown Peron´s government. In those days the airforce bombed Plaza de Mayo when it was full of people supporting Peron. Several hundreds inocent civilians were killed:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revoluci%C3%B3n_Libertadora
Since then, there were several militar and almost democracy governments. I say almost because the militars allowed to make alection but proscribing Peronismo, the most important party.

So, peronistas used civil disobedience to overthrown military and radicales´s governments through the unions.

There was a frustrated atempt to overthrow the military government and the police force fusilladed some people they arrested. So, the violence was started by the government. This is known as "los fusilamientos de Jose Leon Suarez". In those days to be peronista was illegal. Ridicoulous.
http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fusilamientos_de_José_León_Suárez

And Peron was proscribed from 1955 to 1973.

Montoneros first action was to kidnap and judge the former dictator who overthrown Peron and a colaborator. They found him guilty and they shoot him.
They used to kidnap leaders and they used force as a way to make Peron eligeble as a President again. What kind of democracy can have elections where the candidate who is going to win is proscribed???????????????????

So, Peron was elected president againg in 1973 but he was too old then.

Inside the Peronismo there were left and right factions. Both of hem soon became illegals.

Montoneros was onether faction, mild left. We have a montonero government nowadays, there is private property for sure. Montoneros were against the power of the church and against those farmer who own 60% of the land, just a few families.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Montoneros

There were some other guerrilla groups like ERP but they tried to copy the jungle tacticts and they fought in Tucuman.

The triple A was an extremist right death scuad who killed about 2000 people. Triple A were a farmer´s terrorist group.

However, by 1976 Montoneros and ERP were almost dismanteled. They were the excuse:

"However, according to the 1985 Juicio a las Juntas trial, by 1976 both the ERP and the Montoneros had been dismantled, and so there was no real insurgency to legitimize the so-called "Dirty War".

You can read about extrem right´s death scuad (Triple A) here in English:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argentine_Anticommunist_Alliance

So, In my opinion, the left groups were the excuse they use for a "final solution" with an issue that was there for 20 years: peronistas. So, it is a lie that they killed, kidnaped, rape and torture terrorist, they were hunting people because of they political ideas. Peronismo was and is the most important party nowaday as well. So, they killed an entire generation of leaders. That explains the lack of proper leadership during the 80´s and 90´s.

dr__dawggy said:
Isn't it true that in the run up to the Military take over Leftist guerrillas had through a campaign of bombings, kidnappings, extortion, and executions created a climate of fear and near-anarchy?

Well, the last dictatorship government was called state terrorism because they used those techniques for fear you mentioned during the dictatorship and later during democracy.

dr__dawggy said:
You state that only a few military were killed by the guerrillas. Isn't it true that the killings were not limited to members of the military...that bombings killed women and children and that kidnappings and executions of non-military executives of corporations occurred prior to the military take over?

You are talking about Montoneros. Yes, their targets were the leadership and colaborators of the illegal government.

It is debatable, but did you know that according to the National Constitution is 100% legal (nowadays, not then) to use force against any dictator?

dr__dawggy said:
Isn't it also true that the Military take over was a reaction to this climate of fear and lawlessness?

No, it is no true.


dr__dawggy said:
Isn't it further true that the reason Argentina did not become like Nicaragua is because the Military effectively suppressed these leftist groups, who had in mind exactly the sort of wide spread guerrilla warfare that took place in other countries in Latin America?

No, here you show a huge missunderstanding.
Those left extremist groups who try to create a war in the jungle were alone and isolated. Poor people in this country are peronistas, they are not left. So, they had zero support of the population.

dr__dawggy said:
As I have stated earlier in this thread, none of this excuses the ruthlessness of the Military regime or their crimes against humanity.....but it does serve to place the events that led to Military rule in the context of the times..and goes a ways toward explaining why many ordinary citizens were willing to turn a blind eye to the actions of the government.....they were willing to exchange stability and order for a descent into anarchy and possible life under another Cuban style leftist dictatorship.

No, in fact the objective was another. In 1973 Argentina had the widest middle class in the world. The US were second. The objective of the military government was to finish this and they try to create a country with very poor people and just a few rich. They were sucesfull in many ways, that´s why nowadays there are so many poors.

Regards
 
Guillo said:
Its amazing to see people here defend the military that raped and tortured pregnant women by giving electric discharges to fetuses (this is real and docummented).
And its also amazing that people keep comparing isolated (or may be not isolated) terrorist acts with a centrally organized system by the government at the time used to kill, torture, "dissapear" any dissenting voices, and kidnap their children, which is what ended happening in those years.

You are touching a subject that's painfull to a lot of people, you'd better

1. Show proper respect to the victims and families
2. Get informed before posting ignorant drivel out of your collective asses.

Touché! 123456789 characters
 
Back
Top