@ARbound
When Hungary closed the borders, came vawe of refugees to Slovenia. First day came around 1300 people. First they couldn't wait to be registered, most just refused that. When police made some order, bunch of media was reporting about repression against poor people. And all police was doing was respecting the laws.
At the end they all came in, registered. Out of the number around 500 were Syrians, the rest Pakistani, Iraqi and other nationalities. Only 3 of them requested asylum in Slovenia (schengen regulation demands you have to request asylum in first eu country).
So, what is this generalisation you are speaking about? What will happen to Sweden, when they'll get refugees amounting to 20% of their population? It's easy to be smart from Americas, where governments nicely choose, who will migrate...
I understand how the asylum processing in the Schengen zone works, but it's all in theory, the reality is that people desire to be around others they are similar to. Why does this forum exist? Expats/migrants/immigrants/refugees/average joe likes to be around people that have similar traits to their own. If you had to move to say China, (assuming you're not Chinese) you'd be more likely to move to Shanghai or Beijing because the odds are better you can meet/associate with people from your culture there, practice your faith (if applicable) with less restrictions, and ultimately aren't going to be surrounded by as many people who are either afraid or hate you for no reason other than your religion or culture.
To put it even more simply, if you had to choose, where would you go, Germany or Slovenia? One country has a large population of people from your country/culture, the other has maybe 1 mosque for the whole country, and as many arabic speakers.
I'm not defending the actions of opportunists, simply trying to provide some insight in to why they've done what they did, and of course beggars can't be choosers, but Slovenia, Hungary, Croatia didn't want the refugees anyways, so its sort of a moot point about EU regulations.
As for the numbers, we won't know the total until the end of the year when stats for EU nations are prepared, in the end it will be more than 3 for Slovenia.
Does it matter if the people are fleeing Syria or Iraq or Afghanistan or Pakistan or Eritrea? These are the countries 90% or so are coming from, I challenge
anyone on this board to honestly say they'd stay in one of these countries without the resources they have now and try to live a peaceful life/raise a family,
my guess is no one would.
Again, doesn't mean I'm advocating throwing open the flood gates, just contextualizing
why there is people from these countries too.
As for the generalization I'm criticizing, its this notion amongst particularly right wing, older, and christian people that Syrian refugees are not fleeing a war torn
failed state but instead looking for a way to manipulate western countries in to Sharia governed states. Of all the things people have on their mind, I doubt
the concept of an Emirate of Bavaria is among them...
Also, your implication that it easy to say these things because I'm not in Europe is also moot too. If you're in Argentina what does it matter to you? People have
opinions regardless, and I advocate that Canada should take in tens of thousands of people, especially since we seem to have the money to bomb Syria, but we've
taken in under 1,000 people (not families) and it is disgraceful.
Also,
I live in a country where 20.6% of our population wasn't born here, and 51% of the people that live in Toronto were born abroad. Guess what?
Nothing has happened. We don't have sharia law, we don't have a fallen sky, Hell, we've had less terrorist attacks here than in Buenos Aires. Currently the immigrant
population of the United States and Sweden are statistically identical (13% for USA, 15% for Sweden) as this only accounts for legal US immigrants, so, it like Canada,
could be even more than Sweden, and there are no caliphates of Kentucky.
Also, the United States in particular has taken in
Millions of poor, religious, ethnically diverse people since 1776, and it still stands.
How many are terrorists pretending to be refugees?
The same percentage, perhaps slightly more than those who were pretending to be tourists or legal immigrants during the past 100 years of
European History? People ask this question like terrorists trying to enter the EU is something new just because there are more migrants than before.
Was there hundreds of thousands of migrants trying to enter the EU during the Madrid/London attacks?
thats my biggest worry.
and what are Pakistanis doing there?
Economic migration, and if your biggest concern is that there
could be terrorists (which there likely is) trying to enter the EU
then I assume you don't fly, because there
could be terrorists (which there likely is) trying to down planes.
Also, if it really is your biggest concern, and not the plight of millions of people, including children, who have been murdered,
made homeless/nationless, tortured, maimed, left with PTSD and scars emotional and physical then I am sorry for whatever
caused you to lose your sympathy and concern for your fellow man.
It seems like the press focuses on the humanitarian aspects. Don't they notice that 95% of these immigrants are young men?
It's almost like taking women and children across dangerous oceans, deserts, war zones, mountains, etc. might result in there
being more men inclined to do it so they can a) keep their loved ones alive in say Jordan or Turkey while they find work and remit money
back to their family as support. But what do I know...