Aerolineas Cancellations

[Joe]

Would the new law to prevent derogatory comments on the web halt these malicious stories by Clarin and their co-conspirators?

 

[Bajo_cero2]

Would the new law to prevent derogatory comments on the web halt these malicious stories by Clarin and their co-conspirators?

We have to read the law first.

 

[Bajo_cero2]

I will put it that way: if recalde and other political figures wouldn't be involved on highest position, we wouldn't read lies and wouldn't see half the strikes there are now. For that alone he and everyone else is guilty. If country of 40 millions can't find enough people to run companies and government at the same time, better to close it down.

Now seems bigger the country, less people are running it..

Well, guess what? You are alone here.

 

[Bajo_cero2]

And you believe that this adds up to all cancelled flights? Obviously an incompetent manager who wants to hide his lack of skills would never just cherrypick 2-3 flights which had 'real' issues and use the excuse for all the mess he created. But feel free to believe in Recalde, Santa Claus and other fairy tales.

Not so obvious. I showed with something you ignore, FACTS, that you were wrong. I know it doesn' t feel nice. Talk about that with your shrink.

 

[ajoknoblauch]

Not so obvious. I showed with something you ignore, FACTS, that you were wrong. I know it doesn' t feel nice. Talk about that with your shrink.

Facts and excuses should not be synonyms.

 

[Bajo_cero2]

Facts and excuses should not be synonyms.

Facts: there were storms that indeed made a rational decision to cancel flights for safety. There were airplanes with failures that made to flight risky, and they decide a "no go" flight. There was a soft strike and some pilots abused of power. Facts: they are going to be punished as the police men who strike some time ago:

http://www.elonce.com/secciones/politicas/426884-cristina-se-refirin-a-la-condena-a-policnas-de-concordia-por-sedicinn.htm

Facts: Macri play dirty, that is why he is under criminal prosecution for illegal phone tapping:

http://www.lanacion.com.ar/1810384-la-camara-federal-rechazo-sobreseer-a-mauricio-macri-en-la-causa-por-las-escuchas-ilegales

 

[thorsten]

Not so obvious. I showed with something you ignore, FACTS, that you were wrong. I know it doesn' t feel nice. Talk about that with your shrink.

I'd love to see the fact that all cancelled flights are caused by the reasons you mentioned, but showing a single weather report is pagina12 level and might be considered as a FACT for people with an IQ under room temperature. Recalde logic a la "we had snow on one flight and a blackout in a tiny airport, so that should be enough to explain more than 100 flights" is something that thinking people don't buy... Fortunately for you, I can see a huge potential for a political career here based on the way you argue. Good luck!

 

[Bajo_cero2]

I'd love to see the fact that all cancelled flights are caused by the reasons you mentioned, but showing a single weather report is pagina12 level and might be considered as a FACT for people with an IQ under room temperature. Recalde logic a la "we had snow on one flight and a blackout in a tiny airport, so that should be enough to explain more than 100 flights" is something that thinking people don't buy... Fortunately for you, I can see a huge potential for a political career here based on the way you argue. Good luck!

You should learn to read. The weather (a fact proven that you asserted that it was fake) wasn' t the only reason. Read, even if what you read doesn't like you.

If you bought rotten fish, it is normal, but now is when you said, i was wrong, i apologize.

 

[thorsten]

The point is I don't buy the rotten fish you try to sell, even if you try to repeat flawed arguments over and over again.

 

[Bajo_cero2]

The point is I don't buy the rotten fish you try to sell, even if you try to repeat flawed arguments over and over again.

Prove this is rotten fish. I already evidence your asserts are not based on facts.