Sorry to hear you are so sensitive Steve-O !! I am very surprised!steveinbsas said:And you would rather spew out insults (most of which have already been) deleted from this thread)?
Sorry to hear you are so sensitive Steve-O !! I am very surprised!steveinbsas said:And you would rather spew out insults (most of which have already been) deleted from this thread)?
gunt86 said:Given that you would rather spew out falsehoods, than do some research, it is clear that it is in fact you who has an issue with reading.
gunt86 said:Sorry to hear you are so sensitive Steve-O !! I am very surprised!
Indeed. As i have been suggesting from the start. Please feel free to rejoin the discussion after you have finished your research into the case law on this topic. Always pleasant. Perhaps you and Steve can form a study group.mini said:I've been told that it is more diplomatic to say "it seems we have come to a cross roads & have diverging opinions. thus, it is not longer useful to continue this discussion."
Perhaps you learned a little lesson yesterday?...keep it civil on the forum...I can help you with a remedial lesson if you need it.steveinbsas said:If you had used personally identifiable information about me in your posts last night I would be suing you this week. If you really are a lawyer I am surprised you would spew such personal and insulting falsehoods about anyone.
gunt86 said:Indeed. As i have been suggesting from the start. Please feel free to rejoin the discussion after you have finished your research into the case law on this topic. Always pleasant. Perhaps you and Steve can form a study group.
gunt86 said:I have provided for you what i know about the subject based upon numerous conversation with immigration lawyers in Argentina. None of what i have stated is based on hearsay or wild speculation on my part. I am done with providing information on this topic to this forum.
gunt86 said:Perhaps you learned a little lesson yesterday?...keep it civil on the forum...I can help you with a remedial lesson if you need it.
gunt86 said:Incorrect. This "go through the steps of renouncing your US citizenship" is not the only way to demonstrate intent. There are many other ways to show intent, when in fact you might not even have realized that you were giving such evidence! I will give you one little example of intent - joining a foreign military. But there are many many more and far more subtle ways the US gvmt can trip you up on the question of intent.
gunt86 said:Indeed. As i have been suggesting from the start. Please feel free to rejoin the discussion after you have finished your research into the case law on this topic. Always pleasant. Perhaps you and Steve can form a study group.