I understand all of that. I was only pointing out that although this study seems somewhat similar to what the video/doctor was talking about, I don't think this is what he was referencing as neither the dates, specificity, or stats, match up with the video.We are only provided the abstract to the study. It's the academic equivalent of the "Executive Summary" in a business document. The abstract is designed to give the reader a general idea of the study, making the read/no read decision easier. If you want more statistics and numbers and standard deviations, with figures that probably pencil out to two decimal places, it looks like we can order the study from NIH.
Happy to be corrected if I'm wrong?