Do you fear a crash similar to 2001?

That is the range that argentina cannot intervene in the market according to IMF agreement. If the peso goes beyond the range, then it is considered an extreme circumstance and argentina can intervene up to a maximum of 150 million a day.

The peso cannot be sustained as much as they are trying to put out the fire . All this loan is doing is buying time before a more severe crisis eventuates . The government is severely in debt , there is little ingresos due to the failing economy , and the world situation is also bad meaning that it will not climb out this recession easily .
 
That is the range that argentina cannot intervene in the market according to IMF agreement. If the peso goes beyond the range, then it is considered an extreme circumstance and argentina can intervene up to a maximum of 150 million a day.

Thanks for the extra detail! That makes more sense :)
 
My manager from Morgan Stanley Wealth Management just sent this to me. It was in PDF format but I'm copying and pasting if anyone is interested in their thoughts. Wall Street doesn't always get Argentina right but I've found some of the worldwide reports I get from Morgan Stanley to be spot on. Anyway, it helps to read perspectives from some professionals. (I'm breaking it up in 3 posts as there is a limit how much you can post in 1 post). Also keep in mind some of the "See X in parenthesis don't work because there was a URL link to another article and it won't work in copy and paste).

WeekAhead in LatinAmerica | Latin America

Argentina and Chile: Recalibrating Policy

This week we look at Argentina's updated agreement with the IMF: we think the new set of macro policies under the new agreement may help restore confidence. A swifter fiscal adjustment and a larger package should reduce concerns about financing needs, while having both monetary and fiscal policy in highly contractionary territory should help reduce inflation expectations. Targeting monetary aggregates may be preferred over exchange rate targeting, given the authorities limited currency intervention power. But it is not risk-free: further peso volatility could hamper the effectiveness of using base-money targeting as an anchor.

Also, the sacrifice ratio in terms of foregone growth could negatively impact social and political dynamics. We also take a look at Chile's monetary policy outlook. More hawkish guidance indicates the central bank may be heading for the exit with the first rate hike as early as October. Greater conviction that inflation is converging to target, linked mainly to the surprisingly strong economic recovery, is the main motivation, as is a view that there are fewer benefits from holding rates low for longer in today's tougher external environment for emerging economies. Despite the favorable growth outlook, signs of slack remain which means the recovery can carry on without policymakers having to aggressively hit the brakes – so we see a shallow tightening cycle with rates moving to 3.50% in the next half year.

What's new?

While elections continue to dominate the debate in Brazil, the central bank signaled the possibility of gradually reducing the monetary stimulus, which is historically associated with small hikes, depending if the currency consolidates on weaker levels. Amid lack of a breakthrough on Canada-US talks that would open the door for progress with the approval process for NAFTA, Mexico released a series of economic indicators – including upside surprises for retail sales and activity in July plus a good pickup in August industrial exports – confirming that third-quarter growth is normalizing after a small contraction in the previous quarter.

Argentina's central bank governor resigned the day before the announcement of the renewed IMF agreement, which grants another US$ 7.1 billion funds and anticipates 2020 disbursements: the first public apparition of his replacement was the announcement of a new monetary policy framework consisting of base money targeting and a no intervention band FX system. Colombia's July GDP proxy disappointed, posting a -0.6% sequential contraction even after the soft growth seen in the second quarter, highlighting that, albeit improving, economic growth keeps running below potential.

What's next?

In Brazil, all eyes should remain on the elections, especially the polls, but we have inflation released next week. We will look for signs of whether the recent FX depreciation will generate enough second round effects on inflation to worry the Central Bank and potentially increase risks around our baseline scenario of no rate hikes this year. Banco de Mexico will host its policy meeting and we see rates staying unchanged with a hawkish bias reiterating the need to maintain a "prudent" stance. On the trade front, the US may publish the text for a bilateral deal in order to leave the possibility of signing the agreement before December 1; while out US policy experts argue that US congressional approval for a bilateral deal faces multiple challenges, even if it fails they still expect NAFTA 1.0 to stay in place.
 
Last edited:
The development of central bank credibility helped slow inflation down and the currency appreciated after an initial overshooting, ultimately allowing Uruguay to enter the single-digit inflation range.

Our view

Overall, the new agreement seems to be backed by a relatively consistent set of policies. First, having monetary and fiscal policies both highly contractionary should help reduce inflation, albeit with a lag. It is also important that the elimination of deficit monetization is also expected to pay off on the disinflation front once the pass through effect of the recent currency devaluation fades. Second, a swifter fiscal consolidation combined with a larger and more front-loaded package should help eliminate markets' concerns over the potential for a default, bearing positive implications for FX stability (see Sovereign Credit Strategy: A More Stable Outlook Ahead ). And third, targeting base money while keeping a relatively high degree of FX flexibility seems the most viable option considering the relatively limited FX intervention power the authorities have (see Local Markets Strategy: Why This Is the Time to Go Long Argentina Local Assets).

We think using monetary targeting could prove successful in reducing inflation, with the typical lags. Although potential further FX volatility remains a concern, the new monetary framework is the best option available, in our view, given scarce FX reserves. Assuming some degree of FX stability, keeping base money growth flat until mid-next year could help tame inflation expectations, although it could be argued that targeting broad base money could prove more powerful to reduce inflation. We agree with the IMF view that this is a simple and easy to track system and the clear communication we have seen from the authorities yesterday is also a plus to gain credibility. After all, keeping a tight grip on base money growth is something the authorities can deliver on, either by letting interest rates (LELIQs) fluctuate or by managing reserve requirement ratios, as seen in recent months.

The new FX policy seems an attempt to reduce currency volatility considering the limited fire power. The no intervention zone seems wide enough to keep some of the positive features of floating FX systems, including limiting the pressure on FX reserves and promoting FX risk management by the private sector. Moreover, limiting the volatility of the FX may help reduce the depth and duration of the ongoing recession by giving an FX-focused set of economic agents some certainty to plan their activities.

Despite the seemingly consistent policies, risks are centered around FX volatility and growth sacrifices. We are concerned that a wide band could lead markets to test the currency and push it to the upper limit of the no intervention zone, even if the ARS has already undergone a significant devaluation. We view the announcement of the eventual intervention policy as a hint that the authorities are not willing to defend the currency at all costs. While consistent, the combination of largely restrictive monetary and fiscal policies should increase the sacrifice ratio in terms of foregone output, with its associated social and political costs. Reopening some of the wage agreements that were signed early in the year, when inflation expectations were much lower, could help reduce social discontent.

The approval of the 2019 budget, Brazil's elections, and higher US Treasury yields remain the three most important developments to watch in the coming weeks. First, we keep thinking that the government has enough support from the broader political class to approve the 2019 budget bill currently in Congress. Having said that, we expect a heated discussion in Congress given the swift fiscal consolidation proposed. Second, we
view the Brazilian election as a key external factor to watch, not only for the obvious FX implications associated with a potential depreciation of the Brazilian currency, but also because of the strong link in the real economy, especially in the manufacturing sector. And third, even under the new policy framework Argentina still remains exposed to broader external market jitters.

While deteriorating sentiment towards EM seems to have caught a break, several risk factors remain for countries like Argentina, such as the perspective of further pressure in US Treasury yields (see: "EM Strategy Update: Closing the Short," September 24, 2018). In the event we see another round of EM volatility hurting the Argentine currency, the effectiveness of the monetary aggregate targeting system would be limited.

Bottom line

We think the new set of macro policies under the new IMF agreement may help restore confidence. A swifter fiscal adjustment and a larger package should reduce concerns about financing needs while having both monetary and fiscal policy in highly contractionary territory should help reduce inflation expectations. Targeting monetary aggregates may be preferred over exchange rate targeting, given the authorities limited FX intervention power. But it is not risk-free: further FX volatility could hamper the effectiveness of using base money targeting as an anchor. Also, the sacrifice ratio in terms of foregone growth could impact social and political dynamics negatively.

Argentina releases an important set of high frequency activity indicators for August and September to help watchers gage the depth of the ongoing recession: the manufacturing and construction reports should keep declining at a moderate clip while the September tax revenues and auto production releases will shed light on whether the economy is facing a hard-landing – incoming data thus far suggests it hasn't. Colombia's central bank hosts a rate decision: watchers widely expect no change as external conditions remain unsupportive for easing despite a benign domestic inflation picture, to be reinforced by the September CPI release. In Chile, the executive will unveil its 2019 budget initiative by the end-of-month deadline; policymakers previewed their plan for only a small increase in spending (3.2% in real terms) which, combined with prospects for above-trend growth next year, seems consistent with the plan to gradually narrow the public sector deficit with an eye on an eventual stabilization in debt ratios.

Argentina: Resetting Monetary and FX Policy by Fernando Sedano and Lucas Almeida

The facts

The new agreement between Argentina and the IMF entails a bigger package (USD 57.1 billion versus USD 50 billion) and a front-loading of disbursements between now and 2019. The pending disbursements this year will reach USD 13.4 billion (up from USD 5.8 billion) and will total USD 22.8 billion in 2019 (up from USD 11.7 billion), further reducing financing needs during this period (see Sovereign Credit Strategy: A More Stable Outlook Ahead ). The agreement also incorporates the recently announced objective to reach a zero primary fiscal deficit in 2019. We keep our view that the 2019 budget bill aimed at institutionalizing this goal should be approved by Congress before year-end, after a likely heated debate.

The new agreement also brought a new monetary policy framework as the anchor to reduce inflation. Specifically, the Central Bank of Argentina announced the implementation of a monetary targeting regime to replace inflation targeting as of October 1, with the goal of restoring credibility. Authorities announced that base money will grow at an average nominal monthly rate of 0% between now and June next year (down from an average monthly rate of 4% since May), hinting an extremely tight monetary policy given the ongoing high inflation (see Exhibit 1). The authorities will use the LELIQ rate – which was the reference interest rate under the inflation targeting framework – to manage base money growth. The LELIQ rate will now fluctuate on a daily basis, although policymakers promise to keep it high (60%) for the time being. Further changes in reserve requirement ratios could also be used to attain base money growth targets, especially as the unwinding of the Lebac stock remains in place. Base money growth could exceed zero in the event the Central Bank intervenes buying dollars in the market, thus increasing FX reserves.

FX policy also has been tweaked, with the exchange rate expected to fluctuate inside a pre-determined wide band. Starting October 1, this band is set between USDARS 34 and 44, adjusting on a daily basis at a 3% monthly pace between now and year-end, before resetting the pace next year (see Exhibit 2). Argentine authorities referred to the wide band as an intervention zone; while the IMF described the system as a floating FX with no intervention, unless extreme overshooting requires limited intervention to prevent disorderly market conditions. At the top of the band, the monetary authorities can intervene with up to USD 150 million per day. Conversely, should the FX undershoot the band the Central bank may purchase FX and beef up reserves – the sole condition under which the monetary base may expand.
 
The rationale

The IMF has recently stressed that countries successfully reducing inflation from moderate levels – as Argentina’s 20-40% sustained range – to single digits did not use an inflation targeting scheme as the initial anchor. Instead, the IMF stressed that those countries initially used either an exchange rate or a monetary aggregate anchor before moving to an inflation targeting scheme, which was only implemented once inflation approached or reached single digits (see "The Road to Inflation Targeting," In Argentina: Selected Issues, IMF, November 2016). With inflation targeting seemingly failing to do the job and considering the monetary authorities’ weakened credibility, it is not surprising to see the IMF advising Argentina to implement a monetary aggregate targeting mechanism to tame inflation. It is also reasonable to see the IMF staff favoring base money targeting as opposed to exchange rate targeting given its traditional push to greater exchange rate flexibility.

Countries have been moving from fixed exchange rate regimes to more freely floating systems in the past two decades or so. Flexible FX systems provide a cushion to external shocks and give central bankers more autonomy to implement monetary policy. According to IMF research, the pros of more flexible FX systems include reducing the likelihood of one way bets to a currency and the buildup of sizable unhedged foreign currency position (rigid or pegged systems have implicit exchange rate guarantees) as well as stimulating prudent FX risk management (see "Moving to Greater Exchange Rate Flexibility: Operational Aspects Based on Lessons from Detailed Country Experiences," IMF, 2007) However, the IMF also highlights that moving to greater FX flexibility has its risks; the so-called fears of floating. Those include the authorities’ concern about losing policy credibility; the deterioration of external balances due to market-driven currency strength; higher pass through; and potential losses from currency mismatches.

Moving to greater FX flexibility requires finding a new anchor, which most countries found adopting inflation targeting schemes while some others used monetary aggregates instead. Monetary aggregate targeting experiences in Mexico, Peru and Uruguay have helped central banks overcome FX-driven inflationary spikes. The starting point for those experiences commonly involves the adoption of monetary targeting after confidence crises and major FX depreciation, but the underlying conditions and the way the programs were pursued varied. The Uruguayan experience is an interest case to study given its many similarities to the Argentine economy, including a high degree of portfolio dollarization. Amid high inflation, a wide fiscal deficit, capital outflows and a discredited central bank, in mid-2002 Uruguay abandoned a narrow crawling band FX system and adopted monetary base targeting as well as a free-floating FX regime: the changes led the FX to weaken by over 50% in just a few months and ultimately deepened the crisis by pushing inflation and debt levels higher. Following the currency sell-off, however, authorities aimed at restoring their credibility by tightening monetary policy and increasing bank reserve requirements as well as other measures aimed at developing local financial markets (see Exhibit 3).
 
Mauricio Macri did it again yesterday. He slapped Argentines in the face by going on tv and saying everything he promised is going to take longer. And those were his words. "It's going to take longer", and again, offers no details. Again, speaking in generalities. Saying Argentina is going through a storm. I would argue, that the storm is him and his organization.
 
Mauricio Macri did it again yesterday. He slapped Argentines in the face by going on tv and saying everything he promised is going to take longer. And those were his words. "It's going to take longer", and again, offers no details. Again, speaking in generalities. Saying Argentina is going through a storm. I would argue, that the storm is him and his organization.

I don't view it as a slap on the face. Really he should have had a serious speech when he took office laying out the facts to the Argentine people letting them know this mess is going to take a long time to work itself out. He should have said it was an even bigger mess than he thought and he might not be able to deal with everything even in his term. I told people even when he started he won't have enough time during his term to fix everything.

I don't think this is a slap in the face. It's just reality and the truth.
 
Poor Macri he may be remembered as a sad President ! Will he be the First non Peronista president to finish the Mandate..?:rolleyes:
He doesn't need this headache...
 
Back
Top