captainmcd, you seem to overlook what I wrote "decent folks with what they see as a reasonable agenda".
The danger is not from these decent folks but from their perceived allies, who have an ulterior agenda, e.g. "One nation under God" - 'do not want to impose a state religion'?
Some religions have several deities (so not "under God", but "under Gods"), other religions none (Taoism, Buddhism), the app. 17% irreligious Americans neither.
An unpleasant part of the perceived allies wants to impose a theocracy - when in power.
Rick Perry, presidential candidate, published a book only nine monts ago, in which he deemed almost anything unconstitutional (he forgot to include the military - there ought not to be a federal army, which is
big government, only militias, but he conveniently forgot that).
Now that the guests at the Mad Hatter's Teaparty grumble, the hatter declares that he didn't write what he wrote.
Perry is trying to hide his ulterior agenda and I woun't be surprised if the partygoers swallow that - hook, sink and float.
A review of his weirdest ideas admittedly hostile - can be found here:
http://thinkprogress.org/yglesias/2011/08/15/295427/295427/
Exactly how are you going to control him and his ilk, if they win the election?