Bajo_cero2 said:By the way, Cavallo was a neo who studied at Harvard who followed FMI "suggestions" and that´s why the crisis was so deep. Wallstreet and FMI used to love him. In our experience, any time a politician is loved this is because they are ruling the country for them and they are destroying the economy. The K are critized a lot abroad because they are ruling for us, not for them. Fair enough for me...
Well, it is all about it. We have learnt that it will never be enough for those credit risk agencies because the way they measure the risk is a neo way. If we get a better score we commit suicide on the other hand.
And we think they are not reliable, so, I wonder, how is the US doing according to them. Is the US still the zero?
So, if we do what they expect we go into crisis.
And, anyway, credit will be expensive, but less expensive If we dont deal with them and FMI, as I asserted before, this is argentina.
In a former life, I used to manage the litigation of a large bank. It never ceased to amaze me how ingenious borrowers could be in manufacturing excuses why they could not keep their promise to repay a loan and why the bank was responsible for their business' failure. Sorry, but you won't find a sympathetic ear here.
Neither the USA nor the IMF selected Mr Cavallo to manage AR financial affairs. If I'm not mistaken, Pres. Menem did. If you want to lay the blame for AR fiscal mismanagement and defaults at the foot of anyone, then look inward. Stop trying to put the blame for the AR crisis on your lenders. They just gave you the money. You promised to return it and didn't. Period. Two suggestions in this regard: (1) Insist that your Police Dept begin to issue tickets to the weaving, speeding, tailgating drivers. The fines would quickly pay off the country's foreign debt; (2) Use eminent domain for urban renewal of the villas currently situated on prime real estate - the RE tax base would also fill govt coffers.
The Kirchners may have done a good job digging the country out of the hole it mismanged itself into. Nestor drove a hard bargain in 2005 with most all creditors (although curiously he opted to pay off the IMF 100%). Let's see what happens down the road when the AR social security/pension fund has been seriously depleted to pay for current operating expenses. I'm no economist, but I have a vague sense that Argentinians had better hope commodity prices rise, harvests are bountiful, England cedes the Falklands and humongous oil reserves are discovered offshore. Otherwise, I can see a lot of misery on the horizon.
The credit reporting agencies have in deed been exposed as fallible by virtue of their demonstrated incompetence leading up to the subprime credit bubble, but that does not justify discrediting all of their opinions. I'm no expert, but as far as I can tell, the international lending community still relies on the collective opinion/ratings formulated by them to set borrowing rates which is why Argentina will have to pay superhigh rates to borrow again.
I do not profess to be sufficiently sophisticated to appreciate the significance of the "neo" method of credit assessment, but I wonder why you claim that to satisfy the IMF lending criteria (usually issued at below market rates I believe), AR would have to commit financial suicide. Would that mean transparent fiscal management? Efficient tax collection? Exactly what was objectionable with IMF requirements?
Yes, I agree - this is Argentina....so what is the point? AR need not adhere to international fiscal standards?