Kicillof Pays To 92% Of Bondholders, Griesa's Move Now?

[Bajo_cero2]

It was not for you.
It was for Don Alberto who looks local.

 

[ajoknoblauch]

It was not for you.
It was for Don Alberto who looks local.

¿No parezco local?

 

[scotttswan]

It was not for you.
It was for Don Alberto who looks local.

Why does it matter to you so much where Don Alberto is from? You're beginning to sound like ajoknoblauch and his soccer fixation.

 

[Don Alberto]

It was not for you.
It was for Don Alberto who looks local.

I don't see how it could possibly be of relevance to any debate.

As for "looks local", I am sure you don't think ejcot really looks like this

 

[kellrobinson]

I don't see how it could possibly be of relevance to any debate.

As for "looks local", I am sure you don't think ejcot really looks like this

This is ejcot

 

[Bajo_cero2]

It is relevant as soon as you seems to be doing propaganda. And there is a lot of paid people doing it.

You confirmed how relevant it is when you avoid a straight question about that 4 times.

 

[thorsten]

So if a local criticizes something, it is propaganda, while if the same argument comes from a foreigner it's not? Does not make too much sense to me...

 

[Somewhereinba]

It is relevant as soon as you seems to be doing propaganda. And there is a lot of paid people doing it.

You confirmed how relevant it is when you avoid a straight question about that 4 times.

As a lawyer you should be able to argue a topic without resorting to ad hominem attacks about where a person is from.

 

[Don Alberto]

It is relevant as soon as you seems to be doing propaganda. And there is a lot of paid people doing it.

You confirmed how relevant it is when you avoid a straight question about that 4 times.

I haven't answered because you are on my ignore list as being irrelevant and untrustworthy.
I only see (part of) your posts, when somebody else quotes from them.
Your rubbish about paid propaganda only goes to underline my impression.

I supply sources to my claims, you don't, re. e.g. 'is a sovereign state a legal person', above.
You don't even have the decency to acknowledge when I have proven you wrong.

Besides, you have the right to ask all the questions you feel like, but nobody is obliged to answer them.

 

[French jurist]

I supply sources to my claims

Except you ignore the part of your sources which contradict you (e.g. the "bicicleta financiera" in this thread).

Anyway, no big deal