It would be in Argentina's interest to encourage the richer expat, e.g. those that can show a bank account of $100K or more. But regardless, Argentina is by far the most relaxed country for immigration. In Thailand you only get 15 days when you return (by land). They get much more in tourists bucks. It must hurt the tourist trade there - but it's their country.
Thanks for the information, but it still isn't clear what defines a perma-tourist. How many days of the year do they need to be in Argentina to be classified as a perma-tourist (6 months)? Can you give more information on your client that got rejected, how long had he been in Argentina, how many times had he re-entered the country and what questions were asked that failed to satisify the officials?
Ah the golden days of perma-tourist is drawing to an end. (sniff sniff)
I can imagine a lot of language schools will find it harder to find staff now.
But like you say there aren't many other countries in the world that would allow this.
On the other hand Argentina isn't Europe where if they had that situation 90% of Africa and India would try to relocate there.
I suppose its the 'fair' thing to do but weather it will benefit the country, I don't know. I would say Argentina is one place that would really benefit from an influx of ideas and talent form other countries.
Reading between the lines of some of the posts language schools in B.A must employ quite a few 'tourists'. Must be a tricky business especially given that tourists as a rule don't have work rights. I hope there are no compliance officers lurking, they would have a field day!
Immigration to me is a system that must be carefully managed. I have no idea of migration policy is managed in Argentina, here its very much based on skills, experience, age and English lauguage ability, except that is unless you are especially well healed and can afford a business or investment visa. Ideas and talent aside, any influx would spell disaster for the local population, it would be particularly hard for youth (apprenticeships etc) and would be detrimental to the employment market in the long run.
Sorry, but as Bajo says, either your in or your out.....so to speak.
This discussion has me confused and wondering if I need a new plan.
It seemed like, for a long time, the advice here had been to stay off the radar, dont make any applications, dont do visa runs so thats what I've been doing: nothing.
I'm an citizen of the USA.
I got a visa 2 years ago when I was making regular visits, but not staying more than a few weeks at a time.
A year ago I came and haven't left yet. I plan to stay for another 2, 3, 4 years leaving once or twice a year and coming back. I am retired, not working here, living off income from the USA.
I'd appreciate advice on my situation in the current environment.
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
U | 3-month tourist visa and repeated visa runs | Expat Life | 4 | |
![]() |
Visa run being a dual national | Expat Life | 19 | |
S | Uruguay Visa Run | Expat Life | 14 | |
C | Border run visa technicalities | Expat Life | 2 | |
C | Visa Runs | Expat Life | 51 |