Nounou
Registered
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2012
- Messages
- 101
- Likes
- 62
In a word, No.
No one is trying to make anyone a scapegoat. These so-called scapegoats would in any case be long dead and in the grave. Also I am totally mystified on the several posts comparing Australia and Argentina. The former is one of the healthiest economies in the world today, a strong currency and relatively low deficit. The latter is an economic basket-case with a currency that is an joke.
Instead of resorting to the old truism that Argentina's problems are the result of successive bad governments, it is more useful to try and determine why that state of affairs came about.
Instead of throwing out words like "racist", "troll" and "scapegoat" maybe we could offer some theories not based on name calling, for example:
Some have suggested that Argentina's problems are because the people have a distaste for capitalism and "evil businessman" and rely on the government for solutions. I myself find favor with that argument, but if that were the prime case then the French who have the greatest distaste for capitalism would be in the same boat as Argentina.
So what else is there?
There is a Culture of Corruption in Argentina that may have originated in Southern Italy. I know many of you would consider this political incorrect. I suggest to you to stop reading and turn on Oprah.
The reason that this Culture of Corruption took hold in Argentina unlike the other countries that experienced immigration from Italy is that no other country took a majority of their immigration from Italy and particularly southern Italy. Is it just a coincidence that Southern Italy is historically one of the most corrupt places in Europe - if not the world.
If a country took a majority of their new inhabitants from a region with endemic corruption, e.g. China or Nigeria, would it be any surprise that that country ended up an economic basket case because of corruption.
Would Argentina have the same economic problems if a majority of the immigrants had come from Scandinavia?
Joe, take a deep breath! Whilst I didn't expect you to agree with my argument, and lets face it you don't have too, I at no time in my brief discussion called you a 'troll' or 'racist'. I suggest you take that up with the people who did! I did say you had used migration from Italy as a means of scapegoating a particular ethnic group. That charge still stands, as you went on to say...and I quote.....
"The reason that this Culture of Corruption took hold in Argentina unlike the other countries that experienced immigration from Italy is that no other country took a majority of their immigration from Italy and particularly southern Italy. Is it just a coincidence that Southern Italy is historically one of the most corrupt places in Europe - if not the world".
Over the years the level of migration from Southrn Italy has far outstripped the immigration from the north regardless of the county of eventual settlement. You contradict yourself, I rest my case. Corruption is endemic in every country, some are better able to hide it than others. As your little aside in 'turn on Oprah', no thank you, in a week when she is to interview the pinacle of corruption and cheating, Mr Lance Armstorng himself.
As for a distaste for capitalism and a reliance on government, you may well have a point. I, however, as in my initial argument tend to point the finger at the individual. Ideology aside, we all operate on the premise of 'self interest', the above named former cyclist being a prime example, thankfully he's been caught, although still in denial. I wonder if he has any Italian blood in him?.....doubt it somehow!