Ayayay...this really is the limit.
There are more people who support PRO than the small band of sons of the last dictatorship. I suspect you know this but it is the easiest, (i.e. laziest) way to smear PRO. As I have already mentioned I personally know many voters of other parties who now vote PRO because the see them as an option to counter law and order issues and support an international re-engagement with external investment partners.
Me, I am not sure, like all parties here talk is loud, symbolic gestures are big and bright but important things like manifestos and costed plans are non-existant. I prefer them to the Peronists because like the military they have played their part in strangling this country.
I judge people by their own actions, not by their families actions. I'll judge PRO by theirs. I can't quite get you to be honest it seems, you start out by saying PRO are not military then once a few awkward questions are out there we're back to smearing them as military. I can't follow. It's silly to suggest that they are somehow anti-democratic.
On a previous thread you seemed to suggest that only certain companies who have affiliations with PRO members should be banned and not every company active in that era. You're picking those to castigate and those to elevate without any fair and equal criteria.
You can't pick and chose who the victims are. The dead are dead, there no more dead or less dead, no more valid deaths, just deaths.
I'm afraid you aren't really interested in moving on progressively, just a victory parade for the current strain of peronism, it's limiting for you and for the country, it propogates and endless stream of cyclical boom and bust, both in terms of society and economics. Peronism can only artifically inflate then suffocate, the military have no place in govt, only standing outside on ceremonial guard.
This time I really am out because we're having a circular discussion here that has limited value.
