Matiasba
Registered
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2012
- Messages
- 2,298
- Likes
- 1,069
You are kidding, right?
There are so many other factors (some explained with basic social psychology) that can contribute to coca cola consumption increases/decreases that make this particular 'indicator' so vulnerable to any scientific study's internal and external validity bias. And not to even mention the cognitive errors that go into assuming that this could serve as an indicator of 'economic recovery' in any respectable scientific study.
It IS an indicator. Don you know when the 2.25 litters and the 2.5 litters bottles started here? in 2002, and you know why? to compete with these brands, to make the Coca Cola cheaper. Before that, only existed the 1.5 litters bottle.
Im not saying to base any analysis on this indicator, cause that would be crazy, just saying that is an indicator. If you compare the economic cycle of Argentina in the last 15 years it fits with the Coca Cola consumption. Guess why? because Coca Cola is consumption, it is a good, expensive for the poor, and there wasnt consumption in 2002, we had a depressed economy, and now consumption is booming, and that includes the Coca Cola.